March 2020 - openstack-discuss - lists.openstack.org

[horizon][kolla] pyscss failure on newest setuptools
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 10 Mar '20

10 Mar '20

One of Horizon's requirements is pyscss package. Which had last release over 4 years ago... Two days ago setuptools v46 got released. One of changes was drop of Features feature. Today Kolla builds started to fail: INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon:Collecting pyScss===1.3.4 INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon: Downloading http://mirror.ord.rax.opendev.org:8080/pypifiles/packages/1d/4a/221ae7561c8… (120 kB) INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon:[91m ERROR: Command errored out with exit status 1: INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon: command: /var/lib/kolla/venv/bin/python -c 'import sys, setuptools, tokenize; sys.argv[0] = '"'"'/tmp/pip-install-rr0db3qs/pyScss/setup.py'"'"'; __file__='"'"'/tmp/pip-install-rr0db3qs/pyScss/setup.py'"'"';f=getattr(tokenize, '"'"'open'"'"', open)(__file__);code=f.read().replace('"'"'\r\n'"'"', '"'"'\n'"'"');f.close();exec(compile(code, __file__, '"'"'exec'"'"'))' egg_info --egg-base /tmp/pip-install-rr0db3qs/pyScss/pip-egg-info INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon: cwd: /tmp/pip-install-rr0db3qs/pyScss/ INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon: Complete output (5 lines): INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon: Traceback (most recent call last): INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon: File "<string>", line 1, in <module> INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon: File "/tmp/pip-install-rr0db3qs/pyScss/setup.py", line 9, in <module> INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon: from setuptools import setup, Extension, Feature INFO:kolla.common.utils.horizon: ImportError: cannot import name 'Feature' Are there any plans to fix it? pyscss project got issue: https://github.com/Kronuz/pyScss/issues/385 In Kolla I made ugly workaround: https://paste.centos.org/view/2e29d284 What are plans of Horizon team?

1 0

[openstack-helm] VIrtual Midcycle - March 2020
by Gage Hugo 10 Mar '20

10 Mar '20

Hello everyone, just a reminder that we are looking to host a virtual midcycle later this month. If you wish to attend, please fill out the poll[0] and etherpad[1] if you have any topics to discuss. We are looking to host a roughly 4 hour session virtually either next week or the following week. [0] https://doodle.com/poll/g6uvdb4rbad9s8gb [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osh-virtual-ptg-2020-03

1 0

[all] Victoria schedule
by Sean McGinnis 10 Mar '20

10 Mar '20

Hello everyone, The proposed schedule for the Victoria release has now been approved and the schedule published: https://releases.openstack.org/victoria/schedule.html Some of the key dates for Victoria: * Milestone 1 - June 18 * Milestone 2 - July 30 * Milestone 3 - Sept 10 * RC1 deadline - Sept 24 * Final RC deadline - Oct 8 * Victoria coordinated release - Oct 14 Thanks! Sean

1 0

[nova] US meeting slot
by Balázs Gibizer 10 Mar '20

10 Mar '20

Hi, Nova has alternate meeting slots on Thursdays to try to cover contributors from different time zones. * 14:00 UTC * 21:00 UTC As I'm taking over the PTL role form Eric I need to figure out how to run the nova meetings. I cannot really run the UTC 21:00 as it is pretty late for me. (I will run the 14:00 UTC slot). I see different options: a) Somebody from the US side of the globe volunteers to run the 21:00 UTC slot. Please speak up if you would like to run it. I can help you with agenda refresh and technicalities if needed. b) Have only one meeting time, and move that to 16:00 UTC. In this case I will be able to run it most of the weeks. c) Do not have a dedicated meeting slot but switch to office hours. Here we also need to find a time slot. I think 16:00 UTC could work there as well. Please share your view! Any other proposal is very welcome. Cheers, gibi

7 10

[nova][stable] Nova stable branch liaison
by Balázs Gibizer 10 Mar '20

10 Mar '20

Hi Team, According to the wiki [1] we still have Matt as a stable branch liaison for nova. Obviously we need to find somebody else as Matt is gone. I'm not part of the nova-stable-core team so I cannot assume default ownership of that. Also I see that we have a small but active stable team so I hope somebody from that team can step forward and can take this role. Cheers, gibi [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#Stable_Branch

2 2

[Watcher]about meeting on March 11
by licanwei 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hi, We will have the team meeting tomorrow at 08:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt. pls update the meeting agenda if you have something want to be discussed. if nothing need to be discussed, maybe i'll cancel the meeting. thanks, licanwei | | licanwei_cn | | 邮箱：licanwei_cn(a)163.com | 签名由网易邮箱大师定制

1 0

[all][ideas] Introducing Project Teapot: a baremetal cloud for the 2020s
by Zane Bitter 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

I'm pleased to announce the first entry on the new Ideas site (I wanted to call it Crazy Ideas, but JP overruled me and he did all the work to set it up), which also happens to be the reason the Ideas site exists: Project Teapot. (Before we go any further; we all wear a lot of hats in this community, so I'd like to make clear that I'm writing this email wearing my cap-and-bells in my capacity as self-appointed spokes-jester for Project Teapot, and no other.) What is Project Teapot? It's a new kind of cloud that has only one type of workload: Kubernetes on bare metal. Intrigued? Read on: https://governance.openstack.org/ideas/ideas/teapot/index.html What does this have to do with OpenStack? Well, it turns out that the OpenStack community has already built a lot (but not all) of the implementations of things that a cloud like this would need, in the form of projects like Ironic, Manila, Cinder, Keystone, Designate, Barbican. Plus we think it could probably be run as an OpenStack service alongside an existing OpenStack cloud when desired as well. Thanks are due to all of the folks who helped develop this idea, and the domain experts who reviewed it to hopefully eliminate the most egregious errors. Now it's over to you. If you need this, or want to help implement it, we'd like to hear from you on this thread. If you think this is a terrible idea and we should all be run out of town on a rail, we want to hear that too! (Pro tip: use the hashtag #ProjectCrackpot when you complain about it on Twitter.) If you have corrections or additional implementation ideas to add, feel free to submit a patch to the openstack/ideas repo. You can also add questions as inline comments on the original review (https://review.opendev.org/710173) if you want. It might pay to flag anything you post to Gerrit in this thread as well to make sure it's not missed. Finally, if you have ideas of your own, please submit them to the Ideas repo. Remember, they can be as crazy as you want. Let's not let the wisdom of the OpenStack community remain locked up in individual heads. cheers, Zane.

1 0

[qa][cinder][devstack] proposed governance changes for some devstack plugins
by Brian Rosmaita 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hello QA team and devstack-plugin-ceph-core people, The Cinder team has some proposals we'd like to float. 1. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the maintenance of openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [0]. Currently, the devstack-plugin-ceph-core is https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1196,members The cinder-core is already represented by Eric and Sean; we'd like to replace them by including the cinder-core group. 2. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the maintenance of x/devstack-plugin-nfs [1]. Currently, the devstack-plugin-nfs-core is https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1330,members It's already 75% cinder-core members; we'd like to replace the individual members with the cinder-core group. We also propose that devstack-core be added as an included group. 3. The Cinder team is interested in implementing a new devstack plugin: openstack/devstack-plugin-open-cas This will enable thorough testing of a new feature [2] being introduced as experimental in Ussuri and expected to be finalized in Victoria. Our plan would be to make both cinder-core and devstack-core included groups for the gerrit group governing the new plugin. 4. This is a minor point, but can the devstack-plugin-nfs repo be moved back into the 'openstack' namespace? Let us know which of these proposals you find acceptable. [0] https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [1] https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache

3 8

[oslo][infra] Oslo core security team on Launchpad
by Ben Nemec 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hi, I just noticed that the Oslo core security team includes a number of people no longer active in Oslo and also only me for current cores. We should really clean that up so random people aren't getting notified of private security bugs and ideally add some current cores so we have more eyes on said security bugs. How do we go about doing that? I see it's owned by the OpenStack Administrators team, so do I put in a request with the changes or can they just make me an administrator for that group? Thanks. -Ben

2 2

[cinder] reminder: ussuri virtual mid-cycle 16 march at 12:00 UTC
by Brian Rosmaita 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

(Feedback from the last virtual meet-up was that it needed more promotion, so if you know anyone who might be (or should be) interested, please tell them, in addition to marking your own calendar.) Session Two of the Cinder Ussuri virtual mid-cycle will be held: DATE: Monday, 16 March 2020 TIME: 1200-1400 UTC LOCATION: https://bluejeans.com/3228528973 The meeting will be recorded. Please add topics to the planning etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-ussuri-mid-cycle-planning cheers, brian

1 0

[all][tc] Stepping down from TC
by Alexandra Settle 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hi all, This should come as no shock as I have been relatively quite for some time now, but I will not standing for the Technical Committee for a second term. I have thoroughly enjoyed my tenure, learning so much about open source governance than I ever thought I needed 😉 My work takes me elsewhere, as it did several years ago, and I simply do not have the time to manage both. I encourage anyone who is interested in governance, or is passionate about OpenStack and wants to learn more, to stand for the TC elections. As was proven by my own nomination and subsequent successful election, you do not have to be "purely technical" to stand and be a part of something great. Diversity of skill is so important to our survival. Thanks to all those that have supported me to get to the point, I appreciate you all and will miss working intimately with the community. Please do not hesitate to reach out and ask any questions if you are interested in the positions available, happy to help encourage and answer any questions you may have. All the best, Alex ________________________________ Alexandra Settle Senior Technical Writer London, United Kingdom (GMT)

4 3

[neutron] bug deputy report for week of 2020-03-02
by Bence Romsics 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hi All, Here's the deputy report for the week of 2020-03-02. Please note we have a new rotation schedule at the usual place: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings High * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1865453 neutron.tests.functional.plugins.ml2.drivers.ovn.mech_driver.test_mech_driver.TestVirtualPorts.test_virtual_port_created_before fails randomly Random error in the gate. Maciej is working on it. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1866039 [OVN] QoS gives different bandwidth limit measures than ml2/ovs Clearing prerequisites of testing qos in tempest against ovn backend. Work in progress by Maciej: https://review.opendev.org/711048 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1866336 Binding of floating ip agent gateway port and agent_id isn't removed Work in progress by Slawek: https://review.opendev.org/711623 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1866560 FIP Port forwarding description API extension don't work Work in progress by Slawek: https://review.opendev.org/711888 Medium * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1865891 Race condition during removal of subnet from the router and removal of subnet Downstream bug reproduced on master too. Slawek is working on it. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1866068 [OVN] neutron_pg_drop port group table creation race condition Work in progress by Jakub: https://review.opendev.org/711404 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1866160 Update security group failed with the same stateful data Work in progress by Lina: https://review.opendev.org/711385 RFE * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1865889 Routed provider networks support in OVN To be scheduled and discussed on the drivers meeting. Could turn into an RFE * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1866077 [L3][IPv6] IPv6 traffic with DVR in compute host Incomplete * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1866139 GARP not sent on provider network after live migration * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1866445 br-int bridge in one compute can't learn MAC addresses of VMs in other compute nodes Invalid * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1866353 Neutron API returning HTTP 201 for SG rule create when not fully created yet octavia-ovn-provider * https://review.opendev.org/711244 [OVN Octavia Provider] Deleting of listener fails Work in progress by Maciej: https://review.opendev.org/711244 Cheers, Bence (rubasov)

1 0

Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/monasca-agent for ref refs/tags/2.8.1 failed
by Thierry Carrez 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

zuul(a)openstack.org wrote: > Build failed. > > - release-openstack-python https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/25e1809c970044708c503cda05ac84f9 : SUCCESS in 7m 24s > - announce-release https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/646a0bbaa0054504a863b3900b476006 : FAILURE in 7m 55s > - propose-update-constraints https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/5d85de0f42c740299fb5c6c7f24f3aa1 : SUCCESS in 4m 42s Analysis: Release announcement for monasca-agent failed due to the following transient email error: 451 Temporary local problem - please try later Release went out OK, only the announce was missed. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

1 0

[largescale-sig] Next meeting: Mar 11, 9utc
by Thierry Carrez 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hi everyone, The Large Scale SIG will have a meeting this week on Wednesday, Mar 11 at 9 UTC[1] in #openstack-meeting on IRC. As we evolve in DST hell (US having moved to summer time while Europe hasn't), please doublecheck when that falls for you: [1] https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20200311T09 As always, the agenda for our meeting is available at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/large-scale-sig-meeting Feel free to add topics to it! Talk to you all on Wednesday, -- Thierry Carrez

1 0

Goodbye for now
by Albert Braden 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

My contract at Synopsys ends today, so I will have to continue my efforts to sign up as an Openstack developer at my next role. Thanks to everyone for all of the help and advice. Best wishes! Albert

2 1

[Horizon] Unable to access the dashboard page
by Rahul Sharma 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hi, I am trying to get OpenStack (Train) up and running on CentOS 7 by following the "OpenStack Installation Guide" provided on OpenStack's website and have completed installation of below components - Keystone - Glance - Placement - Nova - Networking After installing each component, I have also verified its operation and it seems to be working successfully. However, there is a problem I am facing after installing "Horizon" for dashboard services. In order to verify its operation, one is supposed to browse to the URL "http://controller/horizon/" where "controller" could be the hostname or IP address of the Node which is running the controller Browsing to the above URL throws an error "The requested URL /horizon was not found on this server." In the apache access logs, I see below error: " 103.44.50.92 - - [07/Mar/2020:13:14:52 +0000] "GET /horizon/ HTTP/1.1" 404 206 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/80.0.3987.132 Safari/537.36" 103.44.50.92 - - [07/Mar/2020:13:14:52 +0000] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1" 404 209 "http://3.21.90.63/horizon/" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/80.0.3987.132 Safari/537.36" " If I browse to the URL "http://controller/", the default "Testing123" page of apache gets loaded. Please assist. Thanks, Rahul

4 7

[CINDER] Snapshots export
by Alfredo De Luca 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hi all. We have our env with Openstack (Train) and cinder with CEPH (nautilus) backend. We are creating automatic volumes snapshots and now we'd like to export them as a backup/restore plan. After exporting the snapshots we will use Acronis as backup tool. I couldn't find the right steps/commands to exports the snapshots. Any info? Cheers -- *Alfredo*

5 6

[all][tc] What happened in OpenStack Governance recently
by Jean-Philippe Evrard 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hello, It's been a while there was no update on "what happened in governance recently?" (February). So here is a summary for you! We had two meetings since the last community update, February [1] and March [2]. We have established our first (business-focused) upstream investment opportunities for 2020, which currently consists of: - Goal champions - Consistent and secure policy defaults - QA developers You can see the latest version in [3]. The timing for the next PTL and TC elections is now determined [4]. We've introduced the ideas framework, allowing you to propose, follow, and track large scale changes of OpenStack, with their conversations history [5]. We are starting to split OpenDev out of OpenStack-infra. Our next release names are Victoria and Wallaby. In terms of community goals [6], we've changed the U goal for documentation, so please have a look if you haven't already [7][8], and/or talk to the goal champion Kendall (diablo_rojo). The 'Switch legacy Zuul jobs to native' goal has been selected for Victoria. Please talk to its champion, Luigi Toscano (tosky)! On the projects' side, we've clarified the guidelines to drop official project teams [9]. We want to retire teams more actively if necessary, to allow us to increase our focus. Some projects have changed: - networking-ovn won't get releases anymore, as it's merged back into neutron in U [10] - neutron-lbaas was retired in Ussuri [11] Have a good day to you all! Regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) [1]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2020/tc.2020-02-06-14.00.html [2]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2020/tc.2020-03-05-14.00.html [3]: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/upstream-investment-opportuni… [4]: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708470/3/configuration.yaml [5]: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-February/012847… [6]: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/index.html [7]: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708672/ [8]: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709617/ [9]: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/707421/ [10]: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705781/ [11]: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705780/

1 0

[tc] April meeting
by Jean-Philippe Evrard 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hello everyone, It would be nice if you could update the agenda on the wiki [1] for the April meeting, happening on April, 2nd. Thank you in advance, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp). [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee#Next_Meeting

1 0

[tc] March meeting
by Jean-Philippe Evrard 09 Mar '20

09 Mar '20

Hello, Here are the minutes for the march meeting [1]. There are a few action points for you, please have a look! Regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp) [1]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2020/tc.2020-03-05-14.00.html

1 0

[queens] [neutron]security_groups_log]
by Ignazio Cassano 08 Mar '20

08 Mar '20

Hello, I have queens installation based on centos7. Before implementing security groups logs, I had the following configuration in /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/openvswitch_agent.ini: firewall_driver = iptables_hybrid Enabling security groups log I had to change it in : firewall_driver = openvswitch It seems to work end security logs are logged . After restarting kvm nodes and controllers, virtual machines do not live migrate. The firewall driver change could be the cause of my problem ? firewall_driver = openvswitch is mandatory for security groups log ? Please, any help ? I cannot reproduce the problem rebooting all my nodes. I rebooted them because I hat to transfer from a rack to another. Ignazio

2 5

[queens] [neutron]security_groups_log] issues
by Ignazio Cassano 07 Mar '20

07 Mar '20

Hello, I have queens installation based on centos7. Before implementing security groups logs, I had the following configuration in /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/openvswitch_agent.ini: firewall_driver = iptables_hybrid Enabling security groups log I had to change it in : firewall_driver = openvswitch It seems to work end security logs are logged . After restarting kvm nodes and controllers, virtual machines do not live migrate. I rolled back my configuration without security groups logs feature and now all works fine. The firewall driver change could be the cause of my problem ? firewall_driver = openvswitch is mandatory for security groups log ? Please, any help ? I cannot reproduce the problem rebooting all my nodes. I rebooted them because I hat to transfer from a rack to another. Ignazio

1 0

[nova][qa] When creating a instance using a flavor with "hw:cpu_policy=dedicated" "hw:cpu_realtime=yes" and "hw:cpu_realtime_mask=^0-1" failed.
by Juntingqiu Qiujunting (邱军婷) 06 Mar '20

06 Mar '20

When I create a instance using a flavor with "hw:cpu_policy=dedicated" "hw:cpu_realtime=yes" and "hw:cpu_realtime_mask=^0-1". The error is "libvirtError:Cannot set scheduler parameters for pid 3666:operation not permitted". https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1866311 The instance xml as following: <vcpu placement='static'>4</vcpu> <cputune> <vcpupin vcpu='0' cpuset='3'/> <vcpupin vcpu='1' cpuset='11'/> <vcpupin vcpu='2' cpuset='0'/> <vcpupin vcpu='3' cpuset='8'/> <emulatorpin cpuset='3,11'/> <vcpusched vcpus='2' scheduler='fifo' priority='1'/> <vcpusched vcpus='3' scheduler='fifo' priority='1'/> </cputune> The error log as following: ERROR nova.compute.manager [instance: 74dcc0a1-9ed4-4d13-bef7-ac9623bca2d0] File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 1099, in createWithFlags ERROR nova.compute.manager [instance: 74dcc0a1-9ed4-4d13-bef7-ac9623bca2d0] if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainCreateWithFlags() failed', dom=self) ERROR nova.compute.manager [instance: 74dcc0a1-9ed4-4d13-bef7-ac9623bca2d0] libvirtError: Cannot set scheduler parameters for pid 6504: Operation not permitted ERROR nova.compute.manager [instance: 74dcc0a1-9ed4-4d13-bef7-ac9623bca2d0]

2 1

Re: [sdk][congress][octavia][designate][magnum][senlin][swift] Adding project-specific cores to SDK
by Eric Fried 06 Mar '20

06 Mar '20

Any chance of reusing the “PTL ack” bot that has recently appeared in the releases repo? But as a “SME ack” that would recognize anyone from $project’s core team? (How does the releases bot know which project the patch is for? Might have to be a bit fuzzy on that logic for SDK/OSC.) Then the team could adopt a policy of single core approval if the patch has this SME +1, and no real danger of “abuse”. Eric Fried

4 4

[sdk][congress][octavia][designate][magnum][senlin][swift] Adding project-specific cores to SDK
by Monty Taylor 06 Mar '20

06 Mar '20

Heya, I’d like to try something. I’d like to try adding some project-specific people to the core team so that they can more directly help maintain the support for their service in SDK. In some of these cases the person I’m suggestion has next to no review experience in SDK. I think let’s be fine with that for now - we’re still a 2x +2 in general thing - but I know currently when reviewing neutron or ironic changes I always want to see a +2 from slaweq or dtantsur … so in the spirit of trying new things and trying to move the project forward in a healthy and welcoming way - how about we give this a try? The idea here is that we’re trusting people to use their good judgement and to only use their new +2 powers for good in their project. Over time, if they feel like they’ve gotten a handle on things more widely, there’s nothing stopping them from reviewing other patches - but I think that most of us aren’t looking for additional review work anyway. Specifically this would be: Shogo Saito - congress Adam Harwell - octavia Graham Hayes - designate Bharat Kumar - magnum Erik Olof Gunnar Andersson - senlin Tim Burke - swift I think we should also add a file in the repo that lists “subject matter experts” for each service we’ve got support for, where we have them. My list of current cores who I’d ping for specific service suitability are: Sean McGinnis - cinder Slawek Kaplonski - neutron Dmitry Tantsur - ironic Eric Fried - nova (at least until tomorrow my friend) How does that sound to folks? Monty

4 4