Open Stack

Totally agree with Jeremy. We (UC and TC) should work together to move SIG from that grey area to a formal charter structure.

Thanks,

Edgar 

On 12/15/17, 11:56 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:

    On 2017-12-15 11:43:13 -0600 (-0600), Melvin Hillsman wrote:
    > Sure, as you both know nothing is set in stone at this point.
    > Right now it simply answers the question(s) of who are the folks
    > on the hook to stay updated with what is happening with SIGs,
    > answer questions, provide suggestions, etc, as is currently stated
    > on the SIGs wiki page -
    > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenStack_SIGs. No formal
    > resolutions have been adopted or changed and it would be great for
    > us to answer the questions you and Shamail listed together during
    > the meeting or at least come up with some proposed answers to the
    > questions and gather feedback.
    [...]
    
    It was more of a question of, if there is a disagreement within a
    SIG or between SIGs, to what arbitrating body do they appeal to
    reach some conclusion in the matter? The technical community can
    appeal to the TC for decisions, the user community to the UC, but
    SIGs are a grey area at the moment where this sort of thing is
    concerned.
    -- 
    Jeremy Stanley