[Openstack-operators] OpenStack Storage Backend: Sheepdog, Ceph, or GlusterFS

Hossein Zabolzadeh zabolzadeh at gmail.com
Thu Nov 6 13:01:32 UTC 2014

Thanks for your opinion. But I am looking for the real difference
between them...
- Which one is better support in openstack?
- Which one provides better unified storage backend for all openstack
storage controllers(cinder, swift and glance)?

On 11/6/14, Adrián Norte Fernández <adrian at bashlines.com> wrote:
> I personally find Ceph to be the most mature project and more easily
> scalable.
> El 06/11/2014 13:40, "Hossein Zabolzadeh" <zabolzadeh at gmail.com> escribió:
>> Hello there,
>> I am doubted to select which storage backend(sheepdog, Ceph or
>> GlusterFS) for my openstack production env. I am aware of each project
>> itself, but want to know what is the real difference between them when
>> used as glance, swift and cinder storage backend?
>> Any help appreciated.
>> Thanks in advance.
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list