[Openstack-operators] OpenStack Storage Backend: Sheepdog, Ceph, or GlusterFS

Adrián Norte Fernández adrian at bashlines.com
Thu Nov 6 12:46:27 UTC 2014

I personally find Ceph to be the most mature project and more easily
El 06/11/2014 13:40, "Hossein Zabolzadeh" <zabolzadeh at gmail.com> escribió:

> Hello there,
> I am doubted to select which storage backend(sheepdog, Ceph or
> GlusterFS) for my openstack production env. I am aware of each project
> itself, but want to know what is the real difference between them when
> used as glance, swift and cinder storage backend?
> Any help appreciated.
> Thanks in advance.
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20141106/03299785/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list