[Openstack-docs] Conventions for filenames and chapter/section IDs

Matt Kassawara mkassawara at gmail.com
Mon May 26 15:53:27 UTC 2014


I like the idea of subdirectories. During the installation guide updates
project, I broke the neutron content into smaller files to simplify editing
and to reduce chances of patch collisions. However, this increased the
overall number of files. Implementing subdirectories would mitigate this
issue. The installation guide swift chapter already uses a subdirectory
which I'm debating suggesting for the remainder of the installation guide
and potentially other books.


On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Nick Chase <nchase at mirantis.com> wrote:

> OK, so as I'm breaking out the HA chapter at this very minute, let me
> throw something else into the mix.  The HA Guide is broken into 2 parts,
> each with a number of chapters, each with a number of sections.  Right now
> I've broken it down into chapter files, but as I get down to the section
> level I begin to get overwhelmed with the number of files.  Is there any
> objection to grouping section files in folders by chapter?  For example:
>
> ch_aa_network.xml
> ch_aa_network/sec_run_neutron_dhcp_agent.xml
>
> I mean, I can just as easily make it
>
> ch_aa_network.xml
> sec_run_neutron_dhcp_agent.xml
>
> But it starts to get really messy.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ----  Nick
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Steve Gordon <sgordon at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Anne Gentle" <anne at openstack.org>
>> > To: "Andreas Jaeger" <aj at suse.com>
>> >
>> > Something to think about for ch and sec is that we won't always author
>> in a
>> > book-like manner, so let's not lock ourselves into that sort of thinking
>> > due to current file names.
>> >
>> > Stick to the install guide for now, to apply conventions, just please
>> don't
>> > use something as meaningful semantically as chapter and section.
>>
>> I actually think it's important/useful information in the filename. It
>> reflects the root node of the file's XML which has an impact on where you
>> can nest/include it in another document (you can't include a chapter in a
>> section for example, but you can include a section in a chapter). It's got
>> more to do with the realities of the format being used than whether we're
>> thinking in terms of books, articles, etc.
>>
>> Granted if we moved to a non-XML format this would no longer be the case,
>> but I think we'd have bigger conversion issues than bulk renaming the
>> files/links. ;)
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openstack-docs mailing list
>> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-docs mailing list
> Openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-docs/attachments/20140526/791df983/attachment.html>


More information about the Openstack-docs mailing list