Open Stack

Thank you!

I will deploy it with Quorum Queue and give you my feedback.

On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 8:02 PM Nguyễn Hữu Khôi <nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Helo,
> With kolla ansible
>
> nano /etc/kolla/config/global.conf
>
> [oslo_messaging_rabbit]
> rabbit_quorum_queue = true
>
> but you need destroy (rm rabbitmq container and its volume ) and redeploy
> new one to make quorum queues work.
>
> Nguyen Huu Khoi
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 9:04 AM Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Great! This is good to know that Quorum is a good solution.
>>
>> Do you have a config to enable in kolla-ansible deployment?
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 5:43 AM Arnaud Morin <arnaud.morin at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> We are also using quorum in some regions and plan to enable quorum
>>> everwhere.
>>>
>>> Note that we also manage to enable quorum for transient queues (using a
>>> custom patch as it's not doable with current oslo.messaging, see my
>>> request in [1]).
>>> We also introduced some custom changes in py-amqp to handle correctly
>>> the rabbit disconnections (see [2] and [3]).
>>>
>>> So far, the real improvment is achieved thanks to the combination of all
>>> of these changes, enabling quorum queue only was not enough for us to
>>> notice any improvment.
>>>
>>> The downside of quorum queues is that it consume more power on the
>>> rabbit cluster: you need more IO, CPU, RAM and network bandwith for the
>>> same number of queues (see [4]).
>>> It has to be taken into account.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Arnaud.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-April/033343.html
>>> [2] https://github.com/celery/py-amqp/pull/410
>>> [3] https://github.com/celery/py-amqp/pull/405
>>> [4]
>>> https://plik.ovh/file/nHCny7psDCTrEm76/Pq9ASO9wUd8HRk4C/s_1686817000.png
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13.06.23 - 09:14, Sa Pham wrote:
>>> > Dear Khôi,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for your reply.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 9:05 AM Nguyễn Hữu Khôi <
>>> nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hello.
>>> > > Firstly, when I used the classic queue and sometimes, my rabbitmq
>>> cluster
>>> > > was broken, the computers showed state down and I needed to restart
>>> the
>>> > > computer service to make it up. Secondly, 1 of 3 controller is down
>>> but my
>>> > > system still works although it is not very first as fully
>>> controller. I ran
>>> > > it for about 3 months compared with classic. My openstack is Yoga
>>> and use
>>> > > Kolla-Ansible as a  deployment tool,
>>> > > Nguyen Huu Khoi
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 8:43 AM Sa Pham <saphi070 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Hi Khôi,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Why do you say using the quorum queue is more stable than the
>>> classic
>>> > >> queue ?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 7:26 AM Nguyễn Hữu Khôi <
>>> > >> nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> Hello Huettner,
>>> > >>> I have used the quorum queue since March and it is ok until now. It
>>> > >>> looks more stable than the classic queue.  Some feedback to you.
>>> > >>> Thank you.
>>> > >>> Nguyen Huu Khoi.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 1:14 PM Felix Hüttner
>>> <felix.huettner at mail.schwarz>
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> Hi Nguyen,
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> we are using quorum queues for one of our deployments. So fare we
>>> did
>>> > >>>> not have any issue with them. They also seem to survive restarts
>>> without
>>> > >>>> issues (however reply queues are still broken afterwards in a
>>> small amount
>>> > >>>> of cases, but they are no quorum/mirrored queues anyway).
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> So I would recommend them for everyone that creates a new cluster.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> --
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Felix Huettner
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> *From:* Nguyễn Hữu Khôi <nguyenhuukhoinw at gmail.com>
>>> > >>>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 6, 2023 4:29 AM
>>> > >>>> *To:* OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
>>> > >>>> *Subject:* [OPENSTACK][rabbitmq] using quorum queues
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Hello guys.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> IS there any guy who uses the quorum queue for openstack? Could
>>> you
>>> > >>>> give some feedback to compare with classic queue?
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Thank you.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Nguyen Huu Khoi
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Diese E Mail enthält möglicherweise vertrauliche Inhalte und ist
>>> nur
>>> > >>>> für die Verwertung durch den vorgesehenen Empfänger bestimmt.
>>> > >>>> Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein, setzen Sie den
>>> > >>>> Absender bitte unverzüglich in Kenntnis und löschen diese E Mail.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Hinweise zum Datenschutz finden Sie hier
>>> > >>>> <https://www.datenschutz.schwarz>.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> This e-mail may contain confidential content and is intended only
>>> for
>>> > >>>> the specified recipient/s.
>>> > >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender
>>> > >>>> immediately and delete this e-mail.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Information on data protection can be found here
>>> > >>>> <https://www.datenschutz.schwarz>.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Sa Pham Dang
>>> > >> Skype: great_bn
>>> > >> Phone/Telegram: 0986.849.582
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Sa Pham Dang
>>> > Skype: great_bn
>>> > Phone/Telegram: 0986.849.582
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230701/aa0c80d8/attachment.htm>