[all] Any good alternatives to uwsgi?

Dmitriy Rabotyagov noonedeadpunk at gmail.com
Wed Feb 22 11:56:57 UTC 2023


Hey,

There's already a thread started here yesterday [1]. To have that said
- there's a mod_wsgi-express that can be started like uwsgi and in
standalone fashion [2]

[1] https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-February/032345.html
[2] https://pypi.org/project/mod-wsgi-standalone/

ср, 22 февр. 2023 г. в 11:16, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org>:
>
> Hi there!
>
> It's been a few Debian release that all OpenStack APIs are served using
> uwsgi. Unfortunately:
>
> https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/commit/5838086dd4490b8a55ff58fc0bf0f108caa4e079
>
> The question is then:
> - Is continuing to use uwsgi sustainable?
> - Is there good alternatives?
>
> I do not like at all using Apache mod_wsgi, because restarting Apache
> would mean restarting all services. So I prefer something standalone.
>
> I have no clue if gunicorn is well suited for the job, and if:
> - it performs well
> - it implements the multi-interpreter API (which IMO is mandatory to
> avoid global interpreter locks...)
>
> Any opinion?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>



More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list