Open Stack

Hi Előd,

Horizon team discussed this topic in the horizon weekly meeting [1]
and we are fine with moving the rocky branch to EOL.

Thanks & regards,
Vishal Manchanda

[1]
https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-horizon/%23openstack-horizon.2023-02-01.log.html#t2023-02-01T15:05:45

On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 2:32 PM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 2:24 PM Dmitriy Rabotyagov <noonedeadpunk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, these 2 statements sound quite contradictory to me, as keeping
>> branch in EM and EOLing them are 2 different things.
>>
>> According to the meeting logs I assume you wanted to say that there were
>> no objections to EOL branches / no reasons provided to keep them in EM?
>>
>>
> Yes, correct.
> Sorry for phrasing it in a wrong/confusing way. Cinder team doesn't want
> to keep rocky and stein branches in EM anymore and is ready to EOL them.
>
> Thanks
> Rajat Dhasmana
>
>
>> чт, 2 февр. 2023 г., 19:01 Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman at redhat.com>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Updating cinder status here.
>>> We discussed this in the cinder meeting yesterday[1] and there were no
>>> objections from the team to keep rocky and stein branches in EM.
>>> So cinder is +1 on moving rocky and stein branches to EOL.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting-alt/%23openstack-meeting-alt.2023-02-01.log.html#t2023-02-01T14:42:34
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Rajat Dhasmana
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:18 AM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Elod,
>>>>
>>>> The last commits done in rocky[1] and stein[2] were on Sep 17, 2021.
>>>> Since then we also discovered that one of the job
>>>> definition, nova-multiattach[3] was removed in nova rocky release and since
>>>> nova EOLed their rocky branch[4], that job is breaking (although I haven't
>>>> confirmed with WIP patches but the last commit in September 2021 passed
>>>> that job[5] and the gate breaking was noticed recently with change[6]).
>>>>
>>>> We will discuss this in the cinder upstream meeting this week and will
>>>> update this thread but I'm currently in favor of moving cinder rocky and
>>>> stein branches to EOL.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/cdcf7b5f8b3c850555942f422b8ad1f43e21fe7b
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/667c6da08d423888f1df85d639fef058553f6169
>>>> [3]
>>>> https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/rocky/.zuul.yaml#L153
>>>> [4] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/862520
>>>> [5]
>>>> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/809657/1#message-50e6adf07ba3883a74f6e9939d34f0f0f0fe8d7a
>>>> [6]
>>>> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/871799/3#message-439428e2a146adc233e1a894a7a85004f3f920e4
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Rajat Dhasmana
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:38 PM Elõd Illés <elod.illes at est.tech>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Similarly like the Queens branch EOL proposal [1] I would like to
>>>>> propose
>>>>> to transition every project's stable/rocky to End of Life:
>>>>>
>>>>> - gates are mostly broken
>>>>> - minimal number of activity can be seen on this branch
>>>>> - some core projects already transitioned their stable/rocky to EOL
>>>>>   recently (like ironic, neutron, nova)
>>>>> - gate job definitions are still using the old, legacy zuul syntax
>>>>> - gate jobs are based on Ubuntu Xenial, which is also beyond its public
>>>>>   maintenance window date and hard to maintain
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on the above, if there won't be any project who wants to keep
>>>>> open
>>>>> their stable/rocky, then I'll start the process of EOL'ing Rocky stable
>>>>> series as a whole. If anyone has any objection then please respond to
>>>>> this mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Előd Illés
>>>>> irc: elodilles @ #openstack-stable / #openstack-release
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/031030.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20230203/31148f2c/attachment.htm>