[heat][neutron] improving extraroute support

Slawomir Kaplonski skaplons at redhat.com
Fri May 24 13:47:11 UTC 2019

Hi Bence,

I posted my comment there (in PS6).

> On 21 May 2019, at 10:17, Bence Romsics <bence.romsics at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Some of you may not be aware yet that a new concern was raised
> regarding the extraroute improvement plans just after the last neutron
> session was closed on the PTG.
> It seems we have a tradeoff between the support for the use case of
> tracking multiple needs for the same extra route or keeping the
> virtual router abstraction as simple as it was in the past.
> I'm raising the question of this tradeoff here in the mailing list
> because this (I hope) seems to be the last cross-project question of
> this topic. If we could find a cross-project consensus on this I could
> continue making progress inside each project without need for further
> cross-project coordination. Please help me find this consensus.
> I don't want to unnecessarily repeat arguments already made. I think
> the question is clearly formulated in the comments of patch sets 5, 6
> and 8 of the below neutron-spec:
> https://review.opendev.org/655680 Improve Extraroute API
> All opinions, comments, questions are welcome there.
> Thanks in advance,
> Bence (rubasov)

Slawek Kaplonski
Senior software engineer
Red Hat

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list