[OSC][PTG] Summary: many things to do!
mordred at inaugust.com
Mon May 13 12:39:01 UTC 2019
On 5/10/19 11:55 PM, Nadathur, Sundar wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com>
>> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2019 1:43 PM
>> To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [OSC][PTG] Summary: many things to do!
>> On 5/10/19 4:48 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
>>> OpenStackClient held a session at the Denver PTG and despite not
>>> having much planned had plenty to talk about. Some of the highlights
>>> from the etherpad are:
>> Well, poo. Sorry I missed it.
>>> * Aretm is working on changing the Image commands to use OpenStackSDK.
>>> This is the work described in the cycle goal proposal that he is
>>> planning to do anyway. I support going ahead with this even without
>>> an SDK 1.0 release as it lets us remove glanceclient and some of its
>>> unique dependencies.
>>> * There was some discussion about image encryption and where the
>>> client-side bits of that may land. One option was to put it into
>>> os-brick; if that is where it winds up OSC will make that an optional
>>> dependency de to the number of other dependencies that will introduce.
>>> (ie, OSC currently uses very little of oslo, some of which brings in a
>>> number of things not otherwise needed client-side).
>> We landed support for image signing in SDK:
> The old python-glanceclient has an option to download the image to a local file. I missed that when using the clouds.yaml-based approach that directly accesses the Glance API. Hope we can add that option to the openstacksdk-based client.
Yup - we have this.
The shade side of sdk has had this for a while. We just landed a
refactor which pushes all of the shade image logic into the sdk layer
(thanks to Artem) - so when 0.28.0 is cut later today,
conn.image.download() should work properly in the sdk layer too. But in
the meantime, you can just use conn.download_image and it'll work fine
More information about the openstack-discuss