[nova] Persistent memory resource tracking model
    Jay Pipes 
    jaypipes at gmail.com
       
    Mon Jan  7 14:02:40 UTC 2019
    
    
  
On 01/07/2019 05:05 AM, Sean Mooney wrote:
> i think i share jays preference here in increasing the granularity and eiter tracking
> the allocation in MiBs or Bytes. i do somewhat agree that bytes is likely to fine grained
> hence my perference for mebibytes.
Actually, that's not at all my preference for PMEM :) My preference is 
to use custom resource classes like "CUSTOM_PMEM_NAMESPACE_1TB" because 
the resource is the namespace, not the bunch of blocks/bytes of storage.
With regards to the whole "finest-grained unit" thing, I was just 
responding to Alex Xu's comment:
"The point of the initial design is avoid to encode the `size` in the
  resource class name. If that is ok for you(I remember people hate to
  encode size and number into the trait name), then we will update the
  design. Probably based on the namespace configuration, nova will be
  responsible for create those custom RC first. Sounds works."
Best,
-jay
    
    
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list