Review-Priority for Project Repos
sean.mcginnis at gmx.com
Thu Jan 3 13:51:55 UTC 2019
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 11:04:41AM +0530, Surya Singh wrote:
> Dear All,
> There are many occasion when we want to priorities some of the patches
> whether it is related to unblock the gates or blocking the non freeze
> patches during RC.
> So adding the Review-Priority will allow more precise dashboard. As
> Designate and Cinder projects already experiencing this and after
> discussion with Jeremy brought this to ML to interact with these team
> before landing , as there is possibility that reapply the priority vote
> following any substantive updates to change could make it more cumbersome
> than it is worth.
With Cinder this is fairly new, but I think it is working well so far. The
oddity we've run into, that I think you're referring to here, is how those
votes carry forward with updates.
I set up Cinder with -1, +1, and +2 as possible priority votes. It appears when
a patchset is updates, the -1 and +2 carry forward. But for some reason we
can't get the +1 to be sticky.
So far, that's just a slight inconvenience. It would be great if we can figure
out a way to have them all be sticky, but if we need to live with reapplying +1
votes, that's manageable to me.
The one thing I have been slightly concerned with is the process around using
these priority votes. It hasn't been an issue, but I could see a scenario where
one core (in Cinder we have it set up so all cores can use the priority voting)
has set something like a procedural -1, then been pulled away or is absent for
an extended period. Like a Workflow -2, another core cannot override that vote.
So until that person is back to remove the -1, that patch would not be able to
Granted, we've lived with this with Workflow -2's for years and it's never been
a major issue, but I think as far as centralizing control, it may make sense to
have a separate smaller group (just the PTL, or PTL and a few "deputies") that
are able to set priorities on patches just to make sure the folks setting it
are the ones that are actively tracking what the priorities are for the
Anyway, my 2 cents. I can imagine this would work really well for some teams,
less well for others. So if you think it can help you manage your project
priorities, I would recommend giving it a shot and seeing how it goes. You can
always drop it if it ends up not being effective or causing issues.
More information about the openstack-discuss