Open Stack

Samuel Cassiba wrote:
> [...]
> The moniker of 'low-activity' does give the very real, negative 
> perception that things are just barely hanging on. It conveys the 
> subconscious, officiated statement (!!!whether or not this was 
> intended!!!) that nobody in their right mind should consider using the 
> subproject, let alone develop on or against it, for fear that it wind up 
> some poor end-user's support nightmare. [...]
Yes, that's fair... and why my original suggestion was to do a (regular) 
qualitative report that would use words rather than binary tags.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)