[openstack-dev] [qa][tc][all] Tempest to reject trademark tests
ghayes at suse.de
Wed May 31 16:18:54 UTC 2017
On 31/05/17 16:45, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-05-31 15:22:59 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> On 2017-05-31 09:43:11 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>> it's news to me that they're considering reversing course. If the
>>> QA team isn't going to continue, we'll need to figure out what
>>> that means and potentially find another group to do it.
>> I wasn't there for the discussion, but it sounds likely to be a
>> mischaracterization. I'm going to assume it's not true (or much more
>> nuanced) at least until someone responds on behalf of the QA team.
>> This particular subthread is only going to go further into the weeds
>> until it is grounded in some authoritative details.
> Apologies for replying to myself, but per discussion[*] with Chris
> in #openstack-dev I'm adjusting the subject header to make it more
> clear which particular line of speculation I consider weedy.
> Also in that brief discussion, Graham made it slightly clearer that
> he was talking about pushback on the tempest repo getting tests for
> new trademark programs beyond "OpenStack Powered Platform,"
> "OpenStack Powered Compute" and "OpenStack Powered Object Storage."
Trademark programs are trademark programs - we should have a unified
process for all of them. Let's not make the same mistakes again by
creating classes of projects / programs. I do not want this to be
a distinction as we move forward.
> [*] <URL: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-dev/%23openstack-dev.2017-05-31.log.html#t2017-05-31T15:28:07 >
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the OpenStack-dev