Open Stack

On May 16, 2017, at 3:06 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
> 
>> It's pretty clear now some see drawbacks in reusing #openstack-dev, and
>> so far the only benefit expressed (beyond not having to post the config
>> change to make it happen) is that "everybody is already there". By that
>> rule, we should not create any new channel :)
> 
> That was not the only concern expressed. It also silos us away from
> the community who has elected us to represent them, potentially
> creating another IRC echo chamber.

Unless you somehow restrict access to the channel, it isn't much of a silo. I see TC members in many other channels, so it isn't as if there will be no interaction between TC members and the community that they serve.

I also think that a channel like #openstack-tc is more discoverable to people who might want to interact with the TC, as it follows the same naming convention as #openstack-nova, #openstack-ironic, etc.

-- Ed Leafe





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170516/fdae9374/attachment.sig>