[openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

Jay S Bryant jungleboyj at gmail.com
Wed Dec 13 20:06:08 UTC 2017

On 12/13/2017 12:26 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 06:13:41PM +0000, Tim Bell wrote:
>> The forums would seem to provide a good opportunity for get togethers during the release cycle. With these happening April/May and October/November, there could be a good chance for productive team discussions and the opportunities to interact with the user/operator community.
>> There is a risk that deployment to production is delayed, and therefore feedback is delayed and the wait for the ‘initial bug fixes before we deploy to prod’ gets longer.
>> If there is consensus, I’d suggest to get feedback from openstack-operators on the idea. My initial suspicion is that it would be welcomed, especially by those running from distros, but there are many different perspectives.
>> Tim
> Good point - I was going to bring up some operator aspects as well.
> There have been some discussion within the operators meetup planning around
> trying to bring that operator-driven event closer in, or colocated, with the
> PTG. This is both for logistics planning as well as working on getting that
> feedback loop between operators and development closer.
+2 I have wanted to make it to one of these but have found it 
challenging.  Having it co-located would help a lot.
> We may want to consider some of those needs and how we might make the ops
> midcycle a more visible and potentially bigger event.
> Sean
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list