[openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets

Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) gergely.csatari at nokia.com
Thu Dec 7 09:43:53 UTC 2017


Well, curently there is an operationalState specified into the subnets in IFA005/IFA006, but it was not specified what should happen when a subnet is disabled. This is what was commented in the joint meeting between ETSI NFV and OpenStack in Denver. During the discussions to resolve this issue we considered the suggestion to remove the state completly and decided for the removal.

By he way I use the api-ref [1] more, than the wiki. I believe it contains better information and for me it looks better.

[1]: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/#show-subnet-details


From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkotton at vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 10:05 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets

Can you please elaborate more about the subnet state? FYI - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/APIv2-specification#Subnet

From: "Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest)" <gergely.csatari at nokia.com<mailto:gergely.csatari at nokia.com>>
Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 at 3:13 PM
To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [etsinfv][neutron][gap-09]: No state for subnets


During the discussions in NFV#20 about the subnet state we argeed, that we should remove the state from the specification of subnets in IFA005 and IFA006. This invalidates [GAP-09] in [1].


[1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-denver-etsi-nfv-tst003-gaps-explained
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20171207/6ba0117c/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list