[openstack-dev] [api-wg] Question about 'OpenStack-API-Version' header

Qiming Teng tengqim at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Apr 18 00:38:30 UTC 2017


On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:22:16AM +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Qiming Teng wrote:
> 
> >According to the microversion specification [1], the
> >'OpenStack-API-Version' header is optional. When it is omitted, the
> >server should act as if the minimum supported version was specified.
> 
> That's correct.
> 
> >Recently, we have received some complaints from users that for new APIs
> >added, we should state that the header is required. The new APIs are
> >valid only after a specific microversion. If the 'OpenStack-APi-Version'
> >header is missing, our server returns a 404 resource not found error.
> >It is confusing.
> 
> There's a bit of a circle here. If you're using microversions and you
> add a new feature at, for example, version 2.24 then yes, you must
> include the header with a microversion of 2.24 or beyond in order to
> use that feature. This is aligned with the "opt-in" nature of
> microversions and changes to the service.
> 
> If the new microversion is adding a new URL, then a 404 response is
> correct when that microversion has not been selected.
> 
> So, yes, it is the case that when adding a new URL to a service that
> is already supporting microversions, the header is required. That's
> pretty much how microversions work and the service documentation
> should indicate that.

This answered my question pretty well. Since we are using api-ref to
document the service API, each resource URL is documented separately.
For newly added URL, following micro-version guideline, we are supposed
to state that the micro-version header is required. This was the part
that is missing from the referenced guideline.

Thank you, Chris.

- Qiming
> Is there a different workflow that you (or the people complaining)
> have in mind that could work better? Is there something that could
> or should be clarified to make this more clear?
> 
> -- 
> Chris Dent                 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯           https://anticdent.org/
> freenode: cdent                                         tw: @anticdent

> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list