Open Stack

Sean,

I’d recommend deploy-hosts (I assume this is the bootstrap renamed?)

I’d also add a duplicate API of “deploy” and mark deploy as deprecated and follow the standard deprecation policies.  I’d recommend making the new OpenStack specific deploy command deploy-openstack

Regards
-steve


From: "sean.k.mooney at intel.com" <sean.k.mooney at intel.com>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [poll][kolla] Name of baremetal role/group

Hi
I recently introduced a new baremetal role/group which is used as part of the kolla-host playbook.
https://github.com/openstack/kolla/tree/master/ansible/roles/baremetal
This baremetal role is used to install all the dependencies required to deploy kolla containers on a “baremetal” host.
The host does not have to be baremetal it can be a vm but the term baremetal was originally chosen as unlike other rules in
Kolla it installs and configures packages on the host os.

Given that kolla also has baremetal as a service via ironic and baremetal provision of servers with bifrost the question I would like
To ask is should we change the name of the current role to install the kolla dependencies to something else.

I have created a strawpoll link for this here http://www.strawpoll.me/11175159
The options available in the strawpool are:

·         kolla-host

·         host

·         baremetal

·         pre-install
If there are any other suggestions fell free to discuss them in this thread.
I will check the poll Friday evening gmt and submit a patch for review if consensus is that it should be changed.

Regards
Sean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160907/bb0aa135/attachment.html>