[openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle: virtual or physical?
ruby.loo at intel.com
Tue May 10 15:32:23 UTC 2016
The poll closes Sunday night/Monday morning. Ie, whenever Jim gets around to looking at the numbers Monday (May 16) morning, before our weekly ironic meeting :)
On 2016-05-09, 6:24 PM, "Jim Rollenhagen" <jim at jimrollenhagen.com> wrote:
>In this morning's meetings we discussed having a virtual midcycle again
>this cycle, versus a physical midcycle.
>Pros of virtual:
>* More people can attend (we'd be missing a significant portion of our
> core team at a physical midcycle)
>* Lower cost for employers
>* It went very well last time!
>Cons of virtual:
>* No face-to-face non-work interaction (this is the main reason I hear)
>* Somewhat lower bandwidth
>* No whiteboards
>We seem to be about 50-50 split on this, so I'd like to ask for your
>preference. Here's a poll, please take it:
>Also note that if we do have a physical midcycle, that doesn't mean we
>can't also have some virtual meetups during the cycle :)
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
More information about the OpenStack-dev