[openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

Brian Rosmaita brian.rosmaita at RACKSPACE.COM
Thu Jun 16 19:49:03 UTC 2016


Fei Long and I have followed up on our action item from the glance/ops
mid-cycle sync, namely, to start a discussion among the operators and
product working group so that the Glance team can get a better
understanding of what "Better image lifecycle support" means.  Please
leave comments on this user story patch:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/327980/

cheers,
brian

On 6/8/16, 6:44 PM, "Nikhil Komawar" <nik.komawar at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Please note, due to the last minute additions to the RSVP list, we have
>changed the tool to be used. Update info can now be found here:
>https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-and-ops-midcycle-sync .
>
>Please try to join 5-10 minutes before the meeting as you may have to
>install a plugin and give us time to fix any issues you may face.
>
>
>On 6/7/16 11:51 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> Thanks a ton for the feedback on the time and thanks to Kris for adding
>> items to the agenda [1].
>>
>>
>> Just wanted to announce a few things here:
>>
>>
>> The final decision on the time has been made after a lot of discussions.
>>
>> This event will be on *Thursday June 9th at 1130 UTC*
>>
>> Here's [2] how it looks at/near your timezone.
>>
>>
>> It somewhat manages to accommodate people from different (and extremely
>> diverse) timezones but if it's too early or too late for you for this
>> full *2 hour* sync, please add your interest topics and name against it
>> so that we can schedule your items either later or earlier during the
>> event. The schedule will be tentative unless significant/enough
>> information is provided on time to help set the schedule in advance.
>>
>>
>> I had kept open agenda from the developers' side so that we can
>> collaborate better on the pain points of the operators. You are very
>> welcome to add items to the etherpad [1].
>>
>>
>> The event has been updated to the Virtual Sprints wiki [3] and the
>> details have been added to the etherpad [1] as well. Please feel free to
>> reach out to me for any questions.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the RSVP and see you soon virtually.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-and-ops-midcycle-sync
>> [2]
>> 
>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month
>>=6&day=9&hour=11&min=30&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=2
>>4&p8=78&p9=283&iv=1800
>> [3]
>> 
>>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#Glance_and_Operators_mid-c
>>ycle_sync_for_Newton
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> On 5/31/16 5:13 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your interest.
>>>
>>> Sorry about the confusion. Please consider the same time for Thursday
>>> June 9th.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thur June 9th proposed time:
>>> 
>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&mont
>>>h=6&day=9&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=
>>>24&p8=78&p9=283
>>>
>>>
>>> Alternate time proposal:
>>> 
>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&mont
>>>h=6&day=9&hour=23&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=
>>>24&p8=78&p9=283
>>>
>>>
>>> Overall time planner:
>>> 
>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20160609&p1=8
>>>81&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It will really depend on who is strongly interested in the discussions.
>>> Scheduling with EMEA, Pacific time (US), Australian (esp. Eastern) is
>>> quite difficult. If there's strong interest from San Jose, we may have
>>> to settle for a rather awkward choice below:
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&mont
>>>h=6&day=9&hour=4&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=2
>>>4&p8=78&p9=283
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A vote of +1, 0, -1 on these times would help long way.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/31/16 4:35 PM, Belmiro Moreira wrote:
>>>> Hi Nikhil,
>>>> I'm interested in this discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Initially you were proposing Thursday June 9th, 2016 at 2000UTC.
>>>> Are you suggesting to change also the date? Because in the new
>>>> timeanddate suggestions is 6/7 of June.
>>>>
>>>> Belmiro
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.komawar at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hey,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks for the feedback. 0800UTC is 4am EDT for some of the US
>>>>     Glancers :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     I request this time which may help the folks in Eastern and
>>>>Central US
>>>>
>>>>     time.
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&mon
>>>>th=6&day=7&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p
>>>>7=24&p8=78
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     If it still does not work, I may have to poll the folks in EMEA
>>>>on how
>>>>
>>>>     strong their intentions are for joining this call.  Because
>>>>     another time
>>>>
>>>>     slot that works for folks in Australia & US might be too
>>>>inconvenient
>>>>
>>>>     for those in EMEA:
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&mon
>>>>th=6&day=6&hour=23&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p
>>>>7=24&p8=78
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Here's the map of cities that may be involved:
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20160607&p1=
>>>>881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p7=87&p8=24&p9=78
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Please let me know which ones are possible and we can try to work
>>>>     around
>>>>
>>>>     the times.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 5/31/16 2:54 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     > Hi Nikhil,
>>>>
>>>>     >
>>>>
>>>>     > 2000UTC might catch a few kiwis, but it's 6am everywhere on the
>>>>east
>>>>
>>>>     > coast of Australia, and even earlier out west. 0800UTC, on the
>>>>other
>>>>
>>>>     > hand, would be more sociable.
>>>>
>>>>     >
>>>>
>>>>     > On 26 May 2016 at 15:30, Nikhil Komawar <nik.komawar at gmail.com
>>>>     <mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     >> Thanks Sam. We purposefully chose that time to accommodate some
>>>>     of our
>>>>
>>>>     >> community members from the Pacific. I'm assuming it's just your
>>>>     case
>>>>
>>>>     >> that's not working out for that time? So, hopefully other
>>>>     Australian/NZ
>>>>
>>>>     >> friends can join.
>>>>
>>>>     >>
>>>>
>>>>     >>
>>>>
>>>>     >> On 5/26/16 12:59 AM, Sam Morrison wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     >>> I¹m hoping some people from the Large Deployment Team can come
>>>>     along. It¹s not a good time for me in Australia but hoping someone
>>>>     else can join in.
>>>>
>>>>     >>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>> Sam
>>>>
>>>>     >>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> On 26 May 2016, at 2:16 AM, Nikhil Komawar
>>>>     <nik.komawar at gmail.com <mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> Firstly, I would like to thank Fei Long for bringing up a few
>>>>     operator
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> centric issues to the Glance team. After chatting with him on
>>>>     IRC, we
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> realized that there may be more operators who would want to
>>>>     contribute
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> to the discussions to help us take some informed decisions.
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> So, I would like to call for a 2 hour sync for the Glance
>>>>     team along
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> with interested operators on Thursday June 9th, 2016 at
>>>>2000UTC.
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> If you are interested in participating please RSVP here [1],
>>>>and
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> participate in the poll for the tool you'd prefer. I've also
>>>>     added a
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> section for Topics and provided a template to document the
>>>>     issues clearly.
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> Please be mindful of everyone's time and if you are proposing
>>>>     issue(s)
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> to be discussed, come prepared with well documented &
>>>>     referenced topic(s).
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> If you've feedback that you are not sure if appropriate for
>>>>the
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> etherpad, you can reach me on irc (nick: nikhil).
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> [1]
>>>>     
>>>>https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-and-ops-midcycle-sync
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> --
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> Nikhil Komawar
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> Newton PTL for OpenStack Glance
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>>
>>>>     
>>>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>>>___
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>     
>>>><http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>>>
>>>>     >>>> 
>>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>     >>>
>>>>     
>>>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>>>___
>>>>
>>>>     >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>
>>>>     >>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>     
>>>><http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>>>
>>>>     >>> 
>>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>     >> --
>>>>
>>>>     >>
>>>>
>>>>     >> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>     >> Nikhil
>>>>
>>>>     >>
>>>>
>>>>     >>
>>>>
>>>>     >> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>     >> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>>>
>>>>     >> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>>>     <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>>>>
>>>>     >>
>>>>     
>>>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>>>
>>>>     >
>>>>
>>>>     >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>     Nikhil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>>>___
>>>>
>>>>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>
>>>>     Unsubscribe:
>>>>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>     
>>>><http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>>>
>>>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>>>___
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe: 
>>>>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>
>-- 
>
>Thanks,
>Nikhil
>
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list