Open Stack

Please note, due to the last minute additions to the RSVP list, we have
changed the tool to be used. Update info can now be found here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-and-ops-midcycle-sync .

Please try to join 5-10 minutes before the meeting as you may have to
install a plugin and give us time to fix any issues you may face.


On 6/7/16 11:51 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Thanks a ton for the feedback on the time and thanks to Kris for adding
> items to the agenda [1].
>
>
> Just wanted to announce a few things here:
>
>
> The final decision on the time has been made after a lot of discussions.
>
> This event will be on *Thursday June 9th at 1130 UTC* 
>
> Here's [2] how it looks at/near your timezone.
>
>
> It somewhat manages to accommodate people from different (and extremely
> diverse) timezones but if it's too early or too late for you for this
> full *2 hour* sync, please add your interest topics and name against it
> so that we can schedule your items either later or earlier during the
> event. The schedule will be tentative unless significant/enough
> information is provided on time to help set the schedule in advance.
>
>
> I had kept open agenda from the developers' side so that we can
> collaborate better on the pain points of the operators. You are very
> welcome to add items to the etherpad [1].
>
>
> The event has been updated to the Virtual Sprints wiki [3] and the
> details have been added to the etherpad [1] as well. Please feel free to
> reach out to me for any questions.
>
>
> Thanks for the RSVP and see you soon virtually.
>
>
> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-and-ops-midcycle-sync
> [2]
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=9&hour=11&min=30&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283&iv=1800
> [3]
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#Glance_and_Operators_mid-cycle_sync_for_Newton
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On 5/31/16 5:13 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your interest.
>>
>> Sorry about the confusion. Please consider the same time for Thursday
>> June 9th.
>>
>>
>> Thur June 9th proposed time:
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=9&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283
>>
>>
>> Alternate time proposal:
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=9&hour=23&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283
>>
>>
>> Overall time planner:
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20160609&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283
>>
>>
>>
>> It will really depend on who is strongly interested in the discussions.
>> Scheduling with EMEA, Pacific time (US), Australian (esp. Eastern) is
>> quite difficult. If there's strong interest from San Jose, we may have
>> to settle for a rather awkward choice below:
>>
>>
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=9&hour=4&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283
>>
>>
>>
>> A vote of +1, 0, -1 on these times would help long way.
>>
>>
>> On 5/31/16 4:35 PM, Belmiro Moreira wrote:
>>> Hi Nikhil,
>>> I'm interested in this discussion.
>>>
>>> Initially you were proposing Thursday June 9th, 2016 at 2000UTC.
>>> Are you suggesting to change also the date? Because in the new
>>> timeanddate suggestions is 6/7 of June.
>>>
>>> Belmiro
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.komawar at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hey,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Thanks for the feedback. 0800UTC is 4am EDT for some of the US
>>>     Glancers :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     I request this time which may help the folks in Eastern and Central US
>>>
>>>     time.
>>>
>>>     http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=7&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     If it still does not work, I may have to poll the folks in EMEA on how
>>>
>>>     strong their intentions are for joining this call.  Because
>>>     another time
>>>
>>>     slot that works for folks in Australia & US might be too inconvenient
>>>
>>>     for those in EMEA:
>>>
>>>     http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=6&hour=23&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Here's the map of cities that may be involved:
>>>
>>>     http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20160607&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p7=87&p8=24&p9=78
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Please let me know which ones are possible and we can try to work
>>>     around
>>>
>>>     the times.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 5/31/16 2:54 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
>>>
>>>     > Hi Nikhil,
>>>
>>>     >
>>>
>>>     > 2000UTC might catch a few kiwis, but it's 6am everywhere on the east
>>>
>>>     > coast of Australia, and even earlier out west. 0800UTC, on the other
>>>
>>>     > hand, would be more sociable.
>>>
>>>     >
>>>
>>>     > On 26 May 2016 at 15:30, Nikhil Komawar <nik.komawar at gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     >> Thanks Sam. We purposefully chose that time to accommodate some
>>>     of our
>>>
>>>     >> community members from the Pacific. I'm assuming it's just your
>>>     case
>>>
>>>     >> that's not working out for that time? So, hopefully other
>>>     Australian/NZ
>>>
>>>     >> friends can join.
>>>
>>>     >>
>>>
>>>     >>
>>>
>>>     >> On 5/26/16 12:59 AM, Sam Morrison wrote:
>>>
>>>     >>> I’m hoping some people from the Large Deployment Team can come
>>>     along. It’s not a good time for me in Australia but hoping someone
>>>     else can join in.
>>>
>>>     >>>
>>>
>>>     >>> Sam
>>>
>>>     >>>
>>>
>>>     >>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> On 26 May 2016, at 2:16 AM, Nikhil Komawar
>>>     <nik.komawar at gmail.com <mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> Firstly, I would like to thank Fei Long for bringing up a few
>>>     operator
>>>
>>>     >>>> centric issues to the Glance team. After chatting with him on
>>>     IRC, we
>>>
>>>     >>>> realized that there may be more operators who would want to
>>>     contribute
>>>
>>>     >>>> to the discussions to help us take some informed decisions.
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> So, I would like to call for a 2 hour sync for the Glance
>>>     team along
>>>
>>>     >>>> with interested operators on Thursday June 9th, 2016 at 2000UTC.
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> If you are interested in participating please RSVP here [1], and
>>>
>>>     >>>> participate in the poll for the tool you'd prefer. I've also
>>>     added a
>>>
>>>     >>>> section for Topics and provided a template to document the
>>>     issues clearly.
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> Please be mindful of everyone's time and if you are proposing
>>>     issue(s)
>>>
>>>     >>>> to be discussed, come prepared with well documented &
>>>     referenced topic(s).
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> If you've feedback that you are not sure if appropriate for the
>>>
>>>     >>>> etherpad, you can reach me on irc (nick: nikhil).
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> [1]
>>>     https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-and-ops-midcycle-sync
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> --
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>     >>>> Nikhil Komawar
>>>
>>>     >>>> Newton PTL for OpenStack Glance
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>
>>>     >>>>
>>>     __________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>     >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>
>>>     >>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>>
>>>     >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>     >>>
>>>     __________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>     >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>
>>>     >>> Unsubscribe:
>>>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>>
>>>     >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>     >> --
>>>
>>>     >>
>>>
>>>     >> Thanks,
>>>
>>>     >> Nikhil
>>>
>>>     >>
>>>
>>>     >>
>>>
>>>     >> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>     >> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>>
>>>     >> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>>     <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>>>
>>>     >>
>>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>>
>>>     >
>>>
>>>     >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Thanks,
>>>
>>>     Nikhil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     __________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>
>>>     Unsubscribe:
>>>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>>
>>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>

-- 

Thanks,
Nikhil