Open Stack

On 2016-06-10 11:49:12 +0100 (+0100), Miles Gould wrote:
> On 09/06/16 23:21, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> >There was some discussion about whether or not the Ironic grenade job
> >should be in the check pipeline (even as -nv) for grenade,
> 
> Not having this would mean that changes to grenade could silently break
> Ironic's CI, right? That sounds really bad.

That's like saying it's really bad that changes to devstack could
silently break devstack-based jobs for random projects, and so they
should be tested against every one of those jobs. At some point you
have to draw a line between running a reasonably representative
sample and running so many jobs that you'll never be able to merge
another change again (because even very small nondeterministic
failure rates compound to make that impossible at a certain scale).
-- 
Jeremy Stanley