[openstack-dev] [neutron] [linuxbridge] Multiple VXLAN multicast groups

Jiří Kotlín jiri.kotlin at ultimum.io
Mon Jun 6 08:31:16 UTC 2016


Hi,

yes sorry - I was not concrete enough and the RFE should really be reworded.

Our goal is to have the  ability to control vni-multicast address
distribution somehow, not randomly.

Considering multiple addresses support is already implemented in linux
bridge agent, I suppose implementing this feature should not cause any
problems.

Thanks a lot for this hint and reply, I have tested the CIDR feature, but
forgot to mention this in RFE.

Jiří Kotlín
Developer

Ultimum Technologies s.r.o.
Na Poříčí 1047/26, 11000 Praha 1
Czech Republic

+420 602 288 358
jiri.kotlin at ultimum.io
https://ultimum.io <http://ultimum.io>

linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/company/ultimum-technologies> | twitter
<https://twitter.com/ultimumtech> | facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/ultimumtechnologies/timeline> | google+
<https://plus.google.com/+Ultimumtechnologies001/posts>

2016-06-06 9:36 GMT+02:00 Kevin Benton <kevin at benton.pub>:

> The linux bridge agent does support using multiple VXLAN groups. You can
> specify a prefix for 'vxlan_group' and the VNIs will be spread across the
> multicast addresses in that prefix.[1]
>
> The only difference between that and what your RFE proposes is specific
> control over which multicast address is associated with each VNI. If that
> is a specific requirement, then the RFE needs to be reworded because that
> is the only difference between your proposal and what we have now for Linux
> Bridge.
>
>
> 1.
> https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/d8ae9cf4755416ca65108112a60e8b2e67607daf/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/linuxbridge/agent/common/config.py#L34-L42
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Jiří Kotlín <jiri.kotlin at ultimum.io>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi linuxbridge experts,
>>
>> the ability to define multiple VXLAN groups can be very useful in
>> practice. Is there any design rationale why the vxlan_group was considered
>> a single attribute?
>>
>> More info is in this RFE:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579068
>>
>> Thank you in advance for any help you can provide.
>>
>>
>> Jiří Kotlín
>> Developer
>>
>> Ultimum Technologies s.r.o.
>> Na Poříčí 1047/26, 11000 Praha 1
>> Czech Republic
>>
>> +420 602 288 358
>> jiri.kotlin at ultimum.io
>> https://ultimum.io <http://ultimum.io>
>>
>> linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/company/ultimum-technologies> |
>> twitter <https://twitter.com/ultimumtech> | facebook
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ultimumtechnologies/timeline> | google+
>> <https://plus.google.com/+Ultimumtechnologies001/posts>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160606/963aeb22/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list