The linux bridge agent does support using multiple VXLAN groups. You can specify a prefix for 'vxlan_group' and the VNIs will be spread across the multicast addresses in that prefix.[1] The only difference between that and what your RFE proposes is specific control over which multicast address is associated with each VNI. If that is a specific requirement, then the RFE needs to be reworded because that is the only difference between your proposal and what we have now for Linux Bridge. 1. https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/d8ae9cf4755416ca65108112a60e8b2e67607daf/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/linuxbridge/agent/common/config.py#L34-L42 On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Jiří Kotlín <jiri.kotlin at ultimum.io> wrote: > Hi linuxbridge experts, > > the ability to define multiple VXLAN groups can be very useful in > practice. Is there any design rationale why the vxlan_group was considered > a single attribute? > > More info is in this RFE: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579068 > > Thank you in advance for any help you can provide. > > > Jiří Kotlín > Developer > > Ultimum Technologies s.r.o. > Na Poříčí 1047/26, 11000 Praha 1 > Czech Republic > > +420 602 288 358 > jiri.kotlin at ultimum.io > https://ultimum.io <http://ultimum.io> > > linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/company/ultimum-technologies> | twitter > <https://twitter.com/ultimumtech> | facebook > <https://www.facebook.com/ultimumtechnologies/timeline> | google+ > <https://plus.google.com/+Ultimumtechnologies001/posts> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160606/19addd9e/attachment.html>