Open Stack

Le 29 janv. 2016 18:45, "Julien Danjou" <julien at danjou.info> a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jan 29 2016, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> > Right. I trust everyone on the team to exercise judgment when
> > choosing which patches to review, and how to review them. I proposed
> > Alexis for oslo-core rather than oslo-config-core because his general
> > approach and collaboration on the config work he has already done
> > convinced me that my trust would not be misplaced. The fact that
> > we don't actually have a separate oslo-config-core group in gerrit
> > is an oversight, and didn't enter into it.
>
> I think that summarizes pretty well how our policy which is "forgiveness
> rather than permission".
>
> It really works well, everyone should try it. :-)
>

While my heart is about that, my brain thinks about some regressions could
be happening because of a +W even for a small change.

The problem with most of the projects is that fixing a regression is not
sometimes easy. Think of a DB migration, an o.vo Object being bumped or a
RPC or REST API change as examples.

Even if libraries are not related to that, think how a very small change in
a library can just wedge all our gate and how our history showed us that
fixing that is most of the time much harder in comparison.

I'm not opiniated about the proposal made, I just want to express that
things are not so easy.

-Sylvain

> --
> Julien Danjou
> /* Free Software hacker
>    https://julien.danjou.info */
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160129/ee1c83f5/attachment.html>