[openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project
Jonathan D. Proulx
jon at csail.mit.edu
Fri Aug 5 14:22:24 UTC 2016
I don't have a strong opinion on the split vs stay discussion. It
does seem there's been sustained if ineffective attempts to keep this
together so I lean toward supporting the divorce.
But let's not pretend there are no costs for this.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 07:02:48PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote:
:On 08/04/2016 06:40 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
:>But, if I look at this from a user perspective, if I do want to use
:>anything other than images as cloud artifacts, the story is pretty
:Actually, I beg to differ. A unified OpenStack Artifacts API,
:long-term, will be more user-friendly and less confusing since a
:single API can be used for various kinds of similar artifacts --
:images, Heat templates, Tosca flows, Murano app manifests, maybe
:Solum things, maybe eventually Nova flavor-like things, etc.
The confusion is the current state of two API's, not having a future
Remember how well that served us with nova-network and neutron (né
I also agree with Tim's point. Yes if a new project is fully
documented and integrated well into packaging and config management
implementing it is trivial, but history again teaches this is a long
It also means extra dev overhead to create and mange these
supporting structures to hide the complexity from end users. Now if
the two project are sufficiently different this may not be a
significant delta as the new docs and config management code would be
need in the old project if the new service stayed stayed there.
More information about the OpenStack-dev