> On 25 Sep 2015, at 16:44, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > releases are approaching, so it’s the right time to start some bike shedding on the mailing list. > > Recently I got pointed out several times [1][2] that I violate our commit message requirement [3] for the message lines that says: "Subsequent lines should be wrapped at 72 characters.” > > I agree that very long commit message lines can be bad, f.e. if they are 200+ chars. But <= 79 chars?.. Don’t think so. Especially since we have 79 chars limit for the code. > > We had a check for the line lengths in openstack-dev/hacking before but it was killed [4] as per openstack-dev@ discussion [5]. > > I believe commit message lines of <=80 chars are absolutely fine and should not get -1 treatment. I propose to raise the limit for the guideline on wiki accordingly. > > Comments? > > [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/224728/6//COMMIT_MSG > [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/227319/2//COMMIT_MSG > [3]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GitCommitMessages#Summary_of_Git_commit_message_structure > [4]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142585/ > [5]: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-December/thread.html#52519 > > Ihar Thanks everyone for replies. Now I realize WHY we do it with 72 chars and not 80 chars (git log output). :) I updated the wiki page with how to configure Vim to enforce the rule. I also removed the notion of gating on commit messages because we have them removed since recently. Ihar -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150929/6d7c9444/attachment.pgp>