[openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

Walter A. Boring IV walter.boring at hpe.com
Mon Nov 30 16:50:18 UTC 2015


As a side note to the DR discussion here, there was a session in Tokyo 
that talked about a new
DR project called Smaug.   You can see their mission statement here:
https://launchpad.net/smaug

https://github.com/openstack/smaug

There is another service in the making called DRagon:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upCzuFnswtw
http://www.slideshare.net/AlonMarx/dragon-and-cinder-v-brownbag-54639869

Yes that's 2 DR like service starting in OpenStack that are related to 
dragons.

Walt


> Sean and Michal,
>
> In fact, there is a reason that I ask this question. Recently I have a
> confusion about if cinder should provide the ability of Disaster
> Recovery to storage resources, like volume. I mean we have volume
> replication v1&v2, but for DR, specially DR between two independent
> OpenStack sites(production and DR site), I feel we still need more
> features to support it, for example consistency group for replication,
> etc. I'm not sure if those features belong in Cinder or some new
> project for DR.
>
> BR
> WangHao
>
> 2015-11-30 3:02 GMT+08:00 Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com>:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +0000, Dulko, Michal wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> I notice nova have a clarification of project scope:
>>>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html
>>>>
>>>> I want to find cinder's, but failed,  do you know where to find it?
>>>>
>>>> It's important to let developers know what feature should be
>>>> introduced into cinder and what shouldn't.
>>>>
>>>> BR
>>>> Wang Hao
>>> I believe Nova team needed to formalize the scop to have an explanation
>>> for all the "this doesn't belong in Nova" comments on feature requests.
>>> Does Cinder suffer from similar problems? From my perspective it's not
>>> critically needed.
>> I agree. I haven't seen a need for something like that with Cinder. Wang
>> Hao, is there a reason you feel you need that?
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> .
>




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list