[openstack-dev] [fuel][puppet] Managing upstream puppet modules in fuel-library under librarian
jaypipes at gmail.com
Sat Jul 18 14:55:01 UTC 2015
On 07/17/2015 11:27 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> One of the concerns raised by TC in response to the proposal to add
> Fuel to OpenStack Projects  is the fact that fuel-library includes
> copies of upstream Puppet modules, most importantly from OpenStack
> Puppet .
>  https://review.openstack.org/199232 
> I have brought this up in the Fuel weekly meeting , and we have
> agreed to start implementing the proposal from Alex Schultz to use
> puppet-librarian to manage upstream modules .
> We are days away from Feature Freeze for Fuel 7.0 scheduled for July
> 23 , so it's not reasonable to make librarian mandatory for all
> upstream modules just yet, but I believe that we should make full
> migration to librarian a blocker requirement for Fuel 8.0.
Thanks for stepping up to address this requested change, Dima. I've
given a preliminary review to Alex's puppet-librarian patch and things
look fine from my perspective.
I'm quite interested to know Emilien and Chris Hoge's opinions on this
direction and proposed timeline.
>  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/7.0_Release_Schedule
> In the meanwhile, we're going to try to implement integration of the
> newly added puppet-ironic module under librarian . 
> https://review.openstack.org/194184 
> https://review.openstack.org/202763 
> To make sure this effort does not block integration of Ironic support
> in Fuel 7.0 and does not impact the Feature Freeze, we've set a
> deadline for this effort until Tuesday July 21. Fuelers and other
> Puppet experts, please help Alex and Pavlo get this done on time by
> reviewing their changes and offering advice. It is a small but
> crucial step towards full convergence with upstream, it would help a
> lot if we could confirm now that this approach is viable.
Agreed, reviews from fuel-core folks would be very much appreciated.
More information about the OpenStack-dev