[openstack-dev] [requirements] attention requirements-cores, please look out for constraints updates
robertc at robertcollins.net
Thu Jul 9 10:43:19 UTC 2015
On 9 July 2015 at 21:13, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
>>> I'm wondering if we should not refresh them less often. Some of those
>>> will trigger some discussion before approval
>> ^ if they do, its bogus discussion. We never had discussion previously
>> when new deps flowed into gate jobs willy-nilly - except when it went
>> wrong. The new feature is not a policy knob or control point. [...]
> I was thinking more something along the lines of the "what's up with
> this" in:
So thats folk learning about what goes on. That may happen from time
to time, but since upper-constraints *isn't* a policy knob, its the
wrong place to have discussions about what should or shouldn't be in
>> So lets make this a single +A from any core. Its not code review so
>> much as 'it looks green and we're not in release-freeze right now'.
> OK, so we are not supposed to review the contents of the file (like
> Brant did in this above comment), just to check that we are not in
> "release freeze". Could you detail what you exactly mean by that ?
> Is it that we are not in the middle of the process of releasing our
> weekly batch of libs ? Or that we are not in the dependency freeze
> period at the end of the 6-month cycle ?
During the dependency freeze period, we wouldn't accept bot proposed
changes. The rest of the time, we shouldn't spend cycles thinking
about them - check green, +2A. IMO.
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
HP Converged Cloud
More information about the OpenStack-dev