[openstack-dev] [Manila] Tempest scenario tests vs. gate condition

Valeriy Ponomaryov vponomaryov at mirantis.com
Fri Dec 4 10:33:41 UTC 2015

Hello John,

If I am not mistaken, none of existing Third-Party CIs run scenario tests.
So, it can not be the blocker for you. It is true to say that, for the
moment, API tests is enough for Third-Party CI.

Valeriy Ponomaryov

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 1:38 PM, John Spray <jspray at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> We're working towards getting the devstack/CI parts ready to test the
> forthcoming ceph native driver, and have a question: will a driver be
> accepted into the tree if it has CI for running the api/ tempest
> tests, but not the scenario/ tempest tests?
> The context is that because the scenario tests require a client to
> mount the shares, that's a bit more work for a new protocol such as
> cephfs.  Naturally we intend to do get that done, but would like to
> know if it will be a blocker in getting the driver in tree.
> Many thanks,
> John
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151204/3fdb0324/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list