Open Stack

On 12/03/2015 06:38 AM, John Spray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're working towards getting the devstack/CI parts ready to test the
> forthcoming ceph native driver, and have a question: will a driver be
> accepted into the tree if it has CI for running the api/ tempest
> tests, but not the scenario/ tempest tests?
>
> The context is that because the scenario tests require a client to
> mount the shares, that's a bit more work for a new protocol such as
> cephfs.  Naturally we intend to do get that done, but would like to
> know if it will be a blocker in getting the driver in tree.

This is not currently a requirement for any of the existing 3rd party 
drivers so it wouldn't be fair to enforce it on cephfs.

It *is* something we would like to require at some point, because just 
running the API tests don't really ensure that the driver isn't broken, 
but I'm trying to be sensitive to vendors' limited resources and to add 
CI requirements gradually. The fact that the current generic driver is 
unstable in the gate is a much more serious issue than the fact that 
some drivers don't pass scenario tests.

> Many thanks,
> John
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>