[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes
lsurette at redhat.com
Wed Jan 22 16:17:40 UTC 2014
On Jan 20, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Jaromir Coufal <jcoufal at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> based on feedback which I received last week, I am sending updated wireframes. They are still not completely final, more use-cases and smaller updates will occur, but I believe that we are going forward pretty well.
> What has changed?
> * 'Architecture' dropdown was added for all node descriptions
> * New views for Deployed and Free nodes
> * Removed Configuration part from Deployment Overview page (will be happening under Configuration tab (under construction))
> * Added progressing page of overcloud being deployed + Deployment Log
> * Added Overcloud Horizon UI link to Deployment Overview page
> * Added view for down-scaling (need more work)
> * Added Implementation guide for developers
> New versions of wireframes, supporting other use-cases will occur in time, but I hope that without huge changes.
Nice job keeping up with all of the changes on these. They definitely look to me like they are getting to a state of reality for this release. Just a few nitpicks:
1) Looking at page 6, the user can see that 1 node is down. I think it’s important that they can click on the link and be taken to the table to view details about this node. Would the table be filtered on the nodes that are down (just this one in this example)? I wonder if we should be consistent and add in a 33% of nodes are down?
2) How does the user get back to the list of registered nodes after they’ve clicked on the “Deployment Overview” section of navigation? It seems like they are floating a little bit in the navigation in pages 2-8. Would it make sense to have this be some sort of subsection of the Deployment Overview?
3) Would the “See and change defaults” link switch the user over to the configuration tab? I’m not sure this section even needs to be here if the user doesn’t see anything here in line.
> -- Jarda
> On 2014/16/01 01:50, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes and
>> tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe.
>> Hopefully we are able to deliver described set of features. But if you
>> find something what is missing which is critical for the first release
>> (or that we are implementing a feature which should not have such high
>> priority), please speak up now.
>> The wireframes are very close to implementation. In time, there will
>> appear more views and we will see if we can get them in as well.
>> Thanks all for participation
>> -- Jarda
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
More information about the OpenStack-dev