[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles
tzumainn at redhat.com
Tue Jan 21 14:40:45 UTC 2014
Thanks for starting this! Comments in-line:
> Hi folks,
> when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles,
> there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to
> call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently
> known as Role (= Resource Category).
> Role is a representation of a group of nodes, with specific behavior.
I don't think this is technically correct; according to the wireframes, a 'Role'
is a representation of a group of Heat resources from an overcloud stack - a
Controller Resource, Compute Resource, etc. Free nodes have no Role.
> Each role contains (or will contain):
> * one or more Node Profiles (which specify HW which is going in)
> * association with image (which will be provisioned on new coming nodes)
> * specific service settings
> So far suggested terms:
> * Role *
> - short name - plus points
> - quite overloaded term (user role, etc)
> * Resource Category *
> - pretty long (devs already shorten it - confusing)
> - Heat specific term
That's why I suggested this term after others objected to Role; it seems to me
that whatever term we use should have the world 'Resource' in it, in order to
make the correspondence clear.
> * Resource Class *
> - older term
> Are there any other suggestions (ideally something short and accurate)?
> Or do you prefer any of already suggested terms?
> Any ideas are welcome - we are not very good in finding the best match
> for this particular term.
> -- Jarda
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
More information about the OpenStack-dev