[openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions
mspreitz at us.ibm.com
Wed Nov 20 23:17:16 UTC 2013
Steve Baker <sbaker at redhat.com> wrote on 11/20/2013 06:00:47 PM:
> > What I meant to convey is "let's give this piece of the interface a
> > thought". Not "this is wrong to even have." Given a couple of days
> > I think we do need "apply" and "remove". We should also provide really
> > solid example templates for this concept.
> You're right, I'm already starting to see issues with my current
Can you elaborate? After a little thought, I am starting to warm to the
idea of a 'remove' operation. It fits the desired-state-based management
paradigm like this: it says how to move from state PRESENT to state
BTW, the pair of add and remove operations belong on the config definition
not the config use.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev