Open Stack

Rossella,

Looking forward to getting more details!

Edgar

From:  Rossella Sblendido <rossella at midokura.com>
Reply-To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Date:  Thursday, November 14, 2013 11:48 AM
To:  OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port mirroring

Hi Edgar,

documentation is a great idea. I will make sure to have it. Shall I add it
to the blueprint or just have to keep that in mind?
Yes it will be configurable, if you look at the API I think it's quite
flexible but if you or others have ideas on how to make it better, please
add some comment.

Regarding the overhead, I could give only a vague answer now. Let me think
more through it and I will come back to you. I think the best way is to
provide more details about the implementation in the document so that
everybody can have a better idea of the changes required and can give
his/her feedback too. I will do that.

thanks a lot!

Rossella


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Edgar Magana <emagana at plumgrid.com> wrote:
> Hello Rossella,
> 
> Kyle has a very good point and I wanted to add the documentation request.
> Be sure you have a wiki/document (not a technical one) that we can easily
> transfer into the OpenStack Docs.
> 
> This is a great feature, any idea of the overhead that it will cause?
> I assume that this is going to be totally configurable, right?  :-)
> 
> Edgar
> 
> On 11/14/13 8:34 AM, "Kyle Mestery (kmestery)" <kmestery at cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> >On Nov 14, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Rossella Sblendido <rossella at midokura.com>
>> >wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello devs,
>>> >>
>>> >> I'd like to start working at this blueprint:
>>> >>
>>> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/port-mirroring
>>> >>
>>> >> I didn't receive much feedback so please have a look at it.
>>> >>
>>> >> It was not approved yet. What's the usual workflow? Shall I wait for
>>> >>approval before I start implementing it? Sorry for the trivial question
>>> >>but I'm new here.
>>> >>
>> >Welcome Rossella!
>> >
>> >One issue I have with the design document linked in the blueprint is the
>> >testing section has nothing in it all. Given we're trying hard to focus
>> >on quality and testing, I'd like you to add some specific testing
>> >information to the document before we approve it. It would be ideal to
>> >have Tempest tests which test out the new API functionality as well.
>> >That's my main issue with this BP as seen now, but I'd like others to
>> >comment on this as well.
>> >
>> >Thanks!
>> >Kyle
>> >
>>> >> thanks,
>>> >>
>>> >> Rossella
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131114/40633c8e/attachment.html>