Open Stack

Hi Edgar,

documentation is a great idea. I will make sure to have it. Shall I add it
to the blueprint or just have to keep that in mind?
Yes it will be configurable, if you look at the API I think it's quite
flexible but if you or others have ideas on how to make it better, please
add some comment.

Regarding the overhead, I could give only a vague answer now. Let me think
more through it and I will come back to you. I think the best way is to
provide more details about the implementation in the document so that
everybody can have a better idea of the changes required and can give
his/her feedback too. I will do that.

thanks a lot!

Rossella


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Edgar Magana <emagana at plumgrid.com> wrote:

> Hello Rossella,
>
> Kyle has a very good point and I wanted to add the documentation request.
> Be sure you have a wiki/document (not a technical one) that we can easily
> transfer into the OpenStack Docs.
>
> This is a great feature, any idea of the overhead that it will cause?
> I assume that this is going to be totally configurable, right?  :-)
>
> Edgar
>
> On 11/14/13 8:34 AM, "Kyle Mestery (kmestery)" <kmestery at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> >On Nov 14, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Rossella Sblendido <rossella at midokura.com>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello devs,
> >>
> >> I'd like to start working at this blueprint:
> >>
> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/port-mirroring
> >>
> >> I didn't receive much feedback so please have a look at it.
> >>
> >> It was not approved yet. What's the usual workflow? Shall I wait for
> >>approval before I start implementing it? Sorry for the trivial question
> >>but I'm new here.
> >>
> >Welcome Rossella!
> >
> >One issue I have with the design document linked in the blueprint is the
> >testing section has nothing in it all. Given we're trying hard to focus
> >on quality and testing, I'd like you to add some specific testing
> >information to the document before we approve it. It would be ideal to
> >have Tempest tests which test out the new API functionality as well.
> >That's my main issue with this BP as seen now, but I'd like others to
> >comment on this as well.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >Kyle
> >
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> Rossella
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20131114/3c465078/attachment.html>