[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Tuskar] Icehouse Requirements

James Slagle james.slagle at gmail.com
Mon Dec 9 13:58:43 UTC 2013

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Matt Wagner <matt.wagner at redhat.com> wrote:
>> - As an infrastructure administrator, Anna expects that the
>> management node for the deployment services is already up and running
>> and the status of this node is shown in the UI.
> The 'management node' here is the undercloud node that Anna is
> interacting with, as I understand it. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong.)
> So it's not a bad idea to show its status, but I guess the mere fact
> that she's using it will indicate that it's operational.

That's how I read it as well, which assumes that you're using the
undercloud to manage itself.

FWIW, based on the OpenStack personas I think that Anna would be the
one doing the undercloud setup.  So, maybe this use case should be:

- As an infrastructure administrator, Anna wants to install the
undercloud so she can use the UI.

That piece is going to be a pretty big part of the entire deployment
process, so I think having a use case for it makes sense.

Nice work on the use cases Liz, thanks for pulling them together.

-- James Slagle

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list