[OpenStack-DefCore] [interop-challenge] Workload Results

Gema Gomez gema.gomez-solano at linaro.org
Sun Oct 9 16:20:40 UTC 2016


1.) Your name: Gema Gomez

2.) Your email: gema.gomez-solano at linaro.org

3.) Reporting on behalf of Company/Organization: Linaro

4.) Name and version (if applicable) of the product you tested:
Linaro Developer Cloud (ARM64)

5.) Version of OpenStack the product uses: Newton on Debian (ARM64)

6.) Link to RefStack results for this product: TBD

7.) Workload 1: LAMP Stack with Ansible 
(http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/osops-tools-contrib/tree/ansible/lampstack) 


   A.) Did the workload run successfully? Yes

   B.) If not, did you encounter any end-user visible error messages? 
Please copy/paste them here and provide any context you think would help 
us understand what happened.

   C.) Were you able to determine why the workload failed on this 
product? If so, please describe. Examples: the product is missing a 
feature that the workload assumes is available, the product limits an 
action by policy that the workload requires, the workload assumes a 
particular image type or processor architecture, etc.

   D.) (optional) In your estimation, how hard would it be to modify 
this workload to get it running on this product? Can you describe what 
would need to be done?

8.) Workload 2: Docker Swarm with Terraform 
(http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/osops-tools-contrib/tree/terraform/dockerswarm-coreos) 

   A.) Did the workload run successfully? No.

   B.) If not, did you encounter any end-user visible error messages? 
Please copy/paste them here and provide any context you think would help 
us understand what happened.
It deployed the cluster properly but the containers failed.

   C.) Were you able to determine why the workload failed on this 
product? If so, please describe. Examples: the product is missing a 
feature that the workload assumes is available, the product limits an 
action by policy that the workload requires, the workload assumes a 
particular image type or processor architecture, etc.

The containers are x86 based, we would need to use aarch64 containers 
for them to work (like the coreos image used).

   D.) (optional) In your estimation, how hard would it be to modify 
this workload to get it running on this product? Can you describe what 
would need to be done?

Containers for aarch64 would need to be created / used, instead of the 
x86 ones.

9.) Workload 3: NFV (URL TBD)
   A.) Did the workload run successfully? Haven't tried yet.
   B.) If not, did you encounter any end-user visible error messages? 
Please copy/paste them here and provide any context you think would help 
us understand what happened.

   C.) Were you able to determine why the workload failed on this 
product? If so, please describe. Examples: the product is missing a 
feature that the workload assumes is available, the product limits an 
action by policy that the workload requires, the workload assumes a 
particular image type or processor architecture, etc.

   D.) (optional) In your estimation, how hard would it be to modify 
this workload to get it running on this product? Can you describe what 
would need to be done?

Cheers,
Gema

-- 
Gema Gomez-Solano
Tech Lead, SDI
Linaro Ltd
IRC: gema@#linaro on irc.freenode.net



More information about the Defcore-committee mailing list