Open Stack

Updating RefStack results.

On 09/10/16 17:20, Gema Gomez wrote:
> 1.) Your name: Gema Gomez
> 
> 2.) Your email: gema.gomez-solano at linaro.org
> 
> 3.) Reporting on behalf of Company/Organization: Linaro
> 
> 4.) Name and version (if applicable) of the product you tested:
> Linaro Developer Cloud (ARM64)
> 
> 5.) Version of OpenStack the product uses: Newton on Debian (ARM64)
> 
> 6.) Link to RefStack results for this product: 
https://refstack.openstack.org/#/results/dfd3f68e-7d5a-4b60-b18c-b571d9ae41d3

> 
> 7.) Workload 1: LAMP Stack with Ansible
> (http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/osops-tools-contrib/tree/ansible/lampstack)
> 
> 
>   A.) Did the workload run successfully? Yes
> 
>   B.) If not, did you encounter any end-user visible error messages?
> Please copy/paste them here and provide any context you think would help
> us understand what happened.
> 
>   C.) Were you able to determine why the workload failed on this
> product? If so, please describe. Examples: the product is missing a
> feature that the workload assumes is available, the product limits an
> action by policy that the workload requires, the workload assumes a
> particular image type or processor architecture, etc.
> 
>   D.) (optional) In your estimation, how hard would it be to modify this
> workload to get it running on this product? Can you describe what would
> need to be done?
> 
> 8.) Workload 2: Docker Swarm with Terraform
> (http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/osops-tools-contrib/tree/terraform/dockerswarm-coreos)
> 
>   A.) Did the workload run successfully? No.
> 
>   B.) If not, did you encounter any end-user visible error messages?
> Please copy/paste them here and provide any context you think would help
> us understand what happened.
> It deployed the cluster properly but the containers failed.
> 
>   C.) Were you able to determine why the workload failed on this
> product? If so, please describe. Examples: the product is missing a
> feature that the workload assumes is available, the product limits an
> action by policy that the workload requires, the workload assumes a
> particular image type or processor architecture, etc.
> 
> The containers are x86 based, we would need to use aarch64 containers
> for them to work (like the coreos image used).
> 
>   D.) (optional) In your estimation, how hard would it be to modify this
> workload to get it running on this product? Can you describe what would
> need to be done?
> 
> Containers for aarch64 would need to be created / used, instead of the
> x86 ones.
> 
> 9.) Workload 3: NFV (URL TBD)
>   A.) Did the workload run successfully? Haven't tried yet.
>   B.) If not, did you encounter any end-user visible error messages?
> Please copy/paste them here and provide any context you think would help
> us understand what happened.
> 
>   C.) Were you able to determine why the workload failed on this
> product? If so, please describe. Examples: the product is missing a
> feature that the workload assumes is available, the product limits an
> action by policy that the workload requires, the workload assumes a
> particular image type or processor architecture, etc.
> 
>   D.) (optional) In your estimation, how hard would it be to modify this
> workload to get it running on this product? Can you describe what would
> need to be done?
> 
> Cheers,
> Gema
> 

-- 
Gema Gomez-Solano
Tech Lead, SDI
Linaro Ltd
IRC: gema@#linaro on irc.freenode.net