Open Stack

Troy Toman wrote:
> I believe we should make an effort to clarify the .5 votes -
> particularly for items “on the bubble”  Take security groups and
> floating IPs for instance. If floating IPs were to get a ‘0’ for TC
> Future Direction, it would drop in the yellow territory. If security
> groups were to get a 1 for TC Future Direction it probably moves into
> the green. This is crucial give our desire to put things in core that
> will stay for a considerable length of time. So, if these make it in,
> then we are saying the Compute API will have to continue to support
> them. If Neutron is the preferred future interface for these features,
> it may be better to leave them out in the first pass and bring them in
> when Neutron is ready.
> 
> Perhaps Michael and Anne could take the lead on that particular column
> and how we get the proper TC clarification?

I may have missed it in the sea of emails that were waiting for me at
the end of my vacation week -- where does that TC Future Direction
scoring "column" live ? I assume there is a shared spreadsheet
somewhere, and Rob only posted the compound score ?

Regards,

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/defcore-committee/attachments/20140506/10107c64/attachment.pgp>