Open Stack

Yes definitely! +1

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:21 AM Barrett, Carol L <carol.l.barrett at intel.com>
wrote:

> +1 Good catch!
>
>
>
> *From:* Amy Marrich [mailto:Amy.Marrich at rackspace.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 08, 2016 8:11 AM
> *To:* Megan Rossetti <rossetti.megan18 at gmail.com>;
> women-of-openstack at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Women-of-openstack] [Women-of-OpenStack]
>
>
>
> I +1 the idea as well and with the changes we’ve discussed for the
> meetings it might help us grow as well.
>
>
>
> Amy
>
>
>
> *From: *Megan Rossetti <rossetti.megan18 at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 9:00 AM
> *To: *"women-of-openstack at lists.openstack.org" <
> women-of-openstack at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *[Women-of-openstack] [Women-of-OpenStack]
>
>
>
> Hi team,
>
>
>
> In Austin, a sub-group was formed to help define a process for AUC (Active
> User Contributor) recognition.  This working group was created to assist
> the User Committee
> <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee> (UC)
> define its constituency in a manner similar to how the Technical Committee
> <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee> (TC)
> has defined the designation of Active Technical Contributors
> <http://governance.openstack.org/reference/charter.html#voters-for-tc-seats-atc>
>  (ATC)/Active Project Contributors
> <http://governance.openstack.org/reference/charter.html#voters-for-ptl-seats-apc> (APC)
> and participants eligible to participate in the electoral process for Project
> Team Leads
> <http://governance.openstack.org/reference/charter.html#project-team-leads> (PTL)
> and Technical Committee members. The User Committee formally started
> conversations to recognize contributions inside the OpenStack community
> that are out of scope for the ATC designation. The scope for this new
> designation is currently being refined but the intent is to recognize
> OpenStack community contributors (such as operators) that are not
> committing code to an OpenStack TC sanctioned project
> <https://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/>. OpenStack
> community contributions such as code contributions to repositories under
> User Committee governance (e.g. OSOps <https://github.com/osops>, ops-tags
> <https://github.com/openstack/ops-tags-team>, etc.), active participation
> in any User Committee working group (e.g. API-WG
> <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/API_Working_Group>, Enterprise-WG
> <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Enterprise_Working_Group>, Product-WG
> <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ProductTeam>, etc.), moderating sessions
> at OpenStack Ops-meetups
> <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Meetups>, organizing
> OpenStack user group meet-ups <https://groups.openstack.org/> across the
> world, and many other forms of contributions are currently being considered
> for inclusion in the formal definition of the User Committee constituency
>
>
>
> During the Mid-Cycle Operators meeting in NYC, we discussed adding the
> Women of OpenStack to the list of recognized groups.  To recognize
> individuals for AUC status, we would need to track active participation
> after each meeting, we are currently developing a form for that purpose.
>
>
>
> I would like to know what the team thinks about this endeavor, and if they
> are interested in AUC recognition.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>  - Megan Rossetti
> _______________________________________________
> Women-of-openstack mailing list
> Women-of-openstack at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/women-of-openstack
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/women-of-openstack/attachments/20160908/8d9ebd0e/attachment-0001.html>