Open Stack

Folks -
Biweekly seems to feel about right.  Keeps the momentum, with out 
burdening some very busy people.  Near the SUmmit we would move to 
weekly.  We can continue to us my teleconference number.

On 11/10/2015 4:37 PM, Amy Marrich wrote:
> I’m good with every other week. I’d hate to lose the momentum that we 
> built before Tokyo.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Amy
>
> From: "Barrett, Carol L" <carol.l.barrett at intel.com 
> <mailto:carol.l.barrett at intel.com>>
> Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 6:34 AM
> To: "women-of-openstack at lists.openstack.org 
> <mailto:women-of-openstack at lists.openstack.org>" 
> <women-of-openstack at lists.openstack.org 
> <mailto:women-of-openstack at lists.openstack.org>>
> Subject: [Women-of-openstack] [OpenStack][Women of OpenStack] Future 
> meeting Frequency
>
> Team – I took the action item in yesterdays’ team meeting to start a 
> thread to determine the frequency of our team meetings. So here goes, 
> starting with some history:
>
>   * Leading up to the Tokyo Summit, we were meeting weekly, primarily
>     working on the details of the activities planned for Tokyo.
>   * Prior to that, we generally met at Summit, with little interaction
>     between
>
> I am proposing that we meet every other week (potentially moving to 
> weekly ahead of the Austin Summit, if needed). I think this strikes a 
> balance between frequent enough for us to maintain our progress 
> towards goals and deliverables, but not being overly burdensome on 
> calendars.
> Pls respond to this thread to either propose another option or 
> indicate you’re OK with this proposal.
> Thanks
> Carol
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Women-of-openstack mailing list
> Women-of-openstack at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/women-of-openstack

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/women-of-openstack/attachments/20151110/211a9e99/attachment.html>