Open Stack

I'm rarely on IRC so I'm looking for a way for people to contact me. Years
past, I had to resort to Twitter DMs to contact the user committee members
since I wasn't on IRC and didn't have email addresses for anyone.

If not Twitter, can we advertise an email addresses to reach the user
committee members individually and as a group?

John

On Thursday, March 14, 2019, Joseph Sandoval <joseph.r.sandoval at gmail.com>
wrote:

> With respect to the 4 Opens. IRC and mailing list are primary means of
> communication.
>  John, would the intent be by listing Twittter handles this amplifies
> communication or are you thinking it could be a safe comm space for a
> community member who needs to be off the record?
>
> -jrs (josephrsandoval)
>
> ps: i'm ok with my twitter handle being listed.
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:15 AM Amy Marrich <amy at demarco.com> wrote:
>
>> Arkady,
>>
>> That is a concern as well as the fact people will not be communicating in
>> the open, nor will those communications be easily searched for like you can
>> with the mail archives. Discarding the Open Source aspect, it does take
>> away from Open Community as well as Open Development.
>>
>> Amy (spotz)
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:07 PM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Amy, what are 4open with respect to user community?
>>>
>>> I always viewed users are one of 4 Os.
>>>
>>> Are you thinking that for open communication we must only use open
>>> sourced based communication?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Arkady
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Amy Marrich <amy at demarco.com>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 14, 2019 12:03 PM
>>> *To:* John Studarus
>>> *Cc:* user-committee
>>> *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] alternative contact details beyond IRC
>>> - Twitter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>>>
>>> While I don't mind having my twitter handle on the page, are we
>>> discarding the Four Opens by encouraging the use of Twitter instead of
>>> maybe promoting the use of this list for async communications?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Amy (spotz)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:34 AM John Studarus <john at jhlconsulting.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Would there be any objections to adding Twitter handles to the user
>>> committee details in addition to IRC? I'm trying to open up the lines of
>>> communications beyond IRC and I've found Twitter to be a good async means
>>> for outreach.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The handles would go on the following table:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://governance.openstack.org/uc/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> User-committee mailing list
>>> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> User-committee mailing list
>> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20190314/7e07b408/attachment.html>