Amy, what are 4open with respect to user community? I always viewed users are one of 4 Os. Are you thinking that for open communication we must only use open sourced based communication? Thanks, Arkady From: Amy Marrich <amy at demarco.com> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 12:03 PM To: John Studarus Cc: user-committee Subject: Re: [User-committee] alternative contact details beyond IRC - Twitter [EXTERNAL EMAIL] While I don't mind having my twitter handle on the page, are we discarding the Four Opens by encouraging the use of Twitter instead of maybe promoting the use of this list for async communications? Thanks, Amy (spotz) On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:34 AM John Studarus <john at jhlconsulting.com<mailto:john at jhlconsulting.com>> wrote: Would there be any objections to adding Twitter handles to the user committee details in addition to IRC? I'm trying to open up the lines of communications beyond IRC and I've found Twitter to be a good async means for outreach. The handles would go on the following table: https://governance.openstack.org/uc/ Thoughts? John _______________________________________________ User-committee mailing list User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20190314/f2769731/attachment.html>