Open Stack

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:

> On 2017-03-30 10:29:23 -0400 (-0400), Shamail Tahir wrote:
> [...]
> > +1, I feel that the name is disassociated from "user story" and therefore
> > can remain the same. Furthermore, if the tool proves to be useful then I
> > would hope other teams besides PWG leverage it as well so it shouldn't be
> > tied too closely in the name.  Can the application site reflect the name
> > being used for the URL and be called "feature-tracker-dashboard"?
>
> Not that it matters a lot to me beyond having to type or
> tab-complete the repository names for the application and associated
> configuration management, but breaking my usual personal rule to
> stay out of bikeshedding I'd suggest something shorter still like
> "feature-tracker" or even "featuretracker" without the hyphen (to
> match the site name).
>

+1, I just suggested "feature-tracker-dashboard" because I thought there
was a naming standard we were trying to follow...  I'm perfectly fine with
the shorter alternatives (featuretracker or feature-tracker) that you
suggested.


> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>



-- 
Thanks,
Shamail Tahir
t: @ShamailXD
tz: Eastern Time
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170330/425b1a0f/attachment.html>