[User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo

Tobias Rydberg tobias at citynetwork.se
Wed Mar 1 21:04:04 UTC 2017


Would be the best for sure. Unfortunately I will personally not be there 
this time. Will check with the rest of the crew if someone will go there.


On 2017-03-01 21:55, Sun, Yih Leong wrote:
>
> If anybody from Public Cloud WG is attending Milan Ops midcycle (Mar 
> 15th-16th), we can meet F2F for discussion on the Product WG workflow, 
> gap-analysis, tracker, templates.
>
> The PWG is also having F2F Midcycle meeting at Milan (Mar 13th-14th).
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-pwg-meetup
>
> *From:*Tobias Rydberg [mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 1, 2017 12:48 PM
> *To:* Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>; Sun, Yih Leong 
> <yih.leong.sun at intel.com>; Kunzmann, Gerald 
> <kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com>; Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh512 at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo
>
> I think this looks like a good idea that will work for our stories. We 
> brought this to discussion during todays group meeting, and we will 
> have another review round at the template to see if it could fit us, 
> if not, get back with feedback why to see if we can find a solution to 
> that.
>
> Tobias
>
> On 2017-03-01 19:27, Edgar Magana wrote:
>
>     That is correct. That is actually part of the best practices for
>     development in the open. Do not come with the final version but
>     building it by pieces with total openness.
>
>     Edgar
>
>     *From: *"Sun, Yih Leong" <yih.leong.sun at intel.com>
>     <mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com>
>     *Date: *Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 9:31 AM
>     *To: *"Kunzmann, Gerald" <kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com>
>     <mailto:kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com>, Zhipeng Huang
>     <zhipengh512 at gmail.com> <mailto:zhipengh512 at gmail.com>
>     *Cc: *"user-committee at lists.openstack.org"
>     <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>     <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>     <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>     *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo
>
>     +1
>
>     Prefix WIP on the commit message. And set workflow as “-1”.
>
>     For example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409878/
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__review.openstack.org_-23_c_409878_&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=-UTHb9EYMmqVNj6Q5mOAMJlz3b9HlBKRaOP8STQSG-A&e=>
>
>     *From:*Kunzmann, Gerald [mailto:kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com]
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, March 1, 2017 8:24 AM
>     *To:* Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh512 at gmail.com>
>     <mailto:zhipengh512 at gmail.com>
>     *Cc:* Sun, Yih Leong <yih.leong.sun at intel.com>
>     <mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com>; Tobias Rydberg
>     <tobias at citynetwork.se> <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>;
>     user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>     *Subject:* RE: [User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo
>
>     Hi Tobias,
>
>     One option could be marking the user story as [WIP] (or any other
>     tag we agree) as long as you are internally working on it? As soon
>     as you remove the tag, this would indicate to wider user committee
>     community to start the broader review.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Gerald
>
>     *From:*Zhipeng Huang [mailto:zhipengh512 at gmail.com]
>     *Sent:* Mittwoch, 1. März 2017 14:16
>     *To:*Kunzmann, Gerald <kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com
>     <mailto:kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com>>
>     *Cc:* Sun, Yih Leong <yih.leong.sun at intel.com
>     <mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com>>; Tobias Rydberg
>     <tobias at citynetwork.se <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>>;
>     user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo
>
>     HI Gerald and all,
>
>     The reason why we in public cloud wg are thinking about setting up
>     our own repo is that for public cloud specific use cases, we could
>     first review it within our group from pure public cloud
>     perspective. and then if the use cases are potentially widely
>     adaptive, then we will output the use cases to
>     openstack-user-story for a broader review.
>
>     On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Kunzmann, Gerald
>     <kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com <mailto:kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>         Hi Tobias,
>
>         I also would be interested to see how/why the template does
>         not fit and check whether we could align, e.g. by adding some
>         optional section into user story template.
>
>         Unfortunately, Wednesday 14:00 UTC is also not possible for me.
>
>         Best regards,
>
>         Gerald
>
>         *From:*Sun, Yih Leong [mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com
>         <mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com>]
>         *Sent:* Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 23:26
>         *To:* Tobias Rydberg <tobias at citynetwork.se
>         <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>>;
>         user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>         *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo
>
>         If it is just a template issue and I think that can be easily
>         work with.
>
>         It will be great if you could let me know why the template
>         does not fit your use case?
>
>         We at Product WG are always looks for improvement. J
>
>         Unfortunately 1400 UTC is not a good time for me.
>
>         *From:*Tobias Rydberg [mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se]
>         *Sent:* Tuesday, February 28, 2017 2:15 PM
>         *To:* user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>         *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] [User-Committee] Gerrit repo
>
>         Thanks for your replies!
>
>         We did discuss that, the reason that we wanted to go with our
>         own was basically that the template does not look exactly the
>         same as is, and in that case more clear to have them
>         separated. Also to be able to have other documents there that
>         are produced by the publiccloud-wg.
>
>         I can agree about the use cases/stories, would be awesome to
>         have them in the same place. Does it matter if our use
>         cases/user stories are not following the same template? We are
>         currently in the process of specifying the template. Will
>         bring this question to the team at tomorrows meeting. You are
>         all welcome at 1400 UTC #openstack-meeting-3 to join the
>         discussion. =)
>
>         Regards,
>         Tobias
>
>         On 2017-02-28 22:15, Yih Leong, Sun. wrote:
>
>             I would agree with Ken and recommend to submit that as a
>             user story to Product WG repo.
>
>
>             On Tuesday, February 28, 2017, Melvin Hillsman
>             <mrhillsman at gmail.com <mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                 +1
>
>                 --
>
>                 *Melvin Hillsman*
>
>                 Ops Technical Lead
>                 OpenStack Innovation Center
>
>
>                 mrhillsman at gmail.com <mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>
>                 phone: (210) 312-1267 <tel:%28210%29%20312-1267>
>                 mobile: (210) 413-1659 <tel:%28210%29%20413-1659>
>                 Learner | Ideation | Belief | Responsibility | Command
>
>                 http://osic.org
>                 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__osic.org_&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=jnKwqze25lOUJ8iEpzU0mwbqD-expVCTVQba6uFkFWI&e=>
>
>
>                 On Feb 28, 2017, at 14:11, Edgar Magana
>                 <edgar.magana at workday.com
>                 <mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:
>
>                     Excellent point Kenny!
>
>                     Tobias,
>
>                     Any concerns using the current repo?
>
>                     Edgar
>
>                     *From: *Kenny Johnston <kenny at kencjohnston.com
>                     <mailto:kenny at kencjohnston.com>>
>                     *Date: *Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 11:55 AM
>                     *To: *Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com
>                     <mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>
>                     *Cc: *Tobias Rydberg <tobias at citynetwork.se
>                     <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>>,
>                     "user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>                     <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>"
>                     <user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>                     <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>,
>                     Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org
>                     <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>>
>                     *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] [User-Committee]
>                     Gerrit repo
>
>                     On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Edgar Magana
>                     <edgar.magana at workday.com
>                     <mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:
>
>                         Hello,
>
>                         Go a head and make the request to infra to
>                         have a new repo. For instance:
>                         https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427819/
>                         <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__review.openstack.org_-23_c_427819_&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=ecd2laeilied37Ii26V2vNyX35FmgVrRfQvoPYrxL4Y&s=OsJTI_Kpjs4NQ29MKDA7YxlgI9InH8Nroge6CchIiF8&e=>
>
>                         Add UC members for approval.
>
>                         Thanks,
>
>                         Edgar
>
>
>                         On 2/28/17, 1:07 AM, "Tobias Rydberg"
>                         <tobias at citynetwork.se
>                         <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>> wrote:
>
>                             Hi all,
>
>                             We in the publiccloud-wg are looking into
>                         the possibility to get our own
>                             Gerrit repo? The reason for this repo
>                         would first of all be to host our
>                             use cases that we will create and
>                         documentation around that, and to have
>                             a formal creation process for these use
>                         cases. We have looked at how
>                             Product WG have been working with their
>                         Users Stories and believe it
>                             would be wise to try to have something
>                         similar.
>
>                     I'd recommend against doing this. The "User
>                     Stories" repository[2] is not exclusive to PWG
>                     members, but should be considered a place to
>                     define and merge user stories for all UC groups/teams.
>
>                     [2]
>                     https://github.com/openstack/openstack-user-stories
>                     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openstack_openstack-2Duser-2Dstories&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=ecd2laeilied37Ii26V2vNyX35FmgVrRfQvoPYrxL4Y&s=CxPGKXc-Ruo-UAMh9IXcibh4rpDhCkXxkEh1nhRJ0N0&e=>
>
>
>                             We are here to motivate this further and
>                         listen to feedback!
>
>                             Kind regards,
>
>                             Tobias Rydberg
>                             Co-Chair Public Cloud WG
>                         tobias at citynetwork.se
>                         <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>
>
>                         _______________________________________________
>                         User-committee mailing list
>                         User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>                         <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>                         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>                         <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=ecd2laeilied37Ii26V2vNyX35FmgVrRfQvoPYrxL4Y&s=V5Eg4m1oBZG9ezH27Ow2tyS9tWfvEhq6olFHSzE7pO0&e=>
>
>
>
>                     -- 
>
>                     Kenny Johnston | irc:kencjohnston | @kencjohnston
>
>                     _______________________________________________
>                     User-committee mailing list
>                     User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>                     <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>                     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>                     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=VH-pyMncEN3DTtAKGTHFcfUWMAP5f6T-wTtn--NJQ6A&e=>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>
>             User-committee mailing list
>
>             User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>             <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>
>             http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>             <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=VH-pyMncEN3DTtAKGTHFcfUWMAP5f6T-wTtn--NJQ6A&e=>
>
>         -- 
>
>
>
>
>         	
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         User-committee mailing list
>         User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>         <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=VH-pyMncEN3DTtAKGTHFcfUWMAP5f6T-wTtn--NJQ6A&e=>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
>
>     Standard Engineer
>
>     IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
>
>     Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
>
>     Email: huangzhipeng at huawei.com <mailto:huangzhipeng at huawei.com>
>
>     Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen
>
>     (Previous)
>
>     Research Assistant
>
>     Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
>
>     University of California, Irvine
>
>     Email: zhipengh at uci.edu <mailto:zhipengh at uci.edu>
>
>     Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402
>
>     OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     User-committee mailing list
>
>     User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>
> -- 
>
>
>
> 	
>
> *Tobias Rydberg*
> Senior Developer
>
> Mobile: +46 733 312780
> Support: +46 8 4000 9000
>
> tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se <mailto:tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se>
> www.citynetwork.se <http://www.citynetwork.se>
>
> City Network Hosting AB
> Borgmästaregatan 18
> SE-371 34 Karlskrona
> Sweden
>
>
> Innovation through open IT Infrastructure *
>
> ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 Certified *
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170301/eb196dcc/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 4411 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170301/eb196dcc/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3945 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170301/eb196dcc/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the User-committee mailing list