[User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo

Tobias Rydberg tobias at citynetwork.se
Wed Mar 1 20:47:37 UTC 2017


I think this looks like a good idea that will work for our stories. We 
brought this to discussion during todays group meeting, and we will have 
another review round at the template to see if it could fit us, if not, 
get back with feedback why to see if we can find a solution to that.

Tobias


On 2017-03-01 19:27, Edgar Magana wrote:
>
> That is correct. That is actually part of the best practices for 
> development in the open. Do not come with the final version but 
> building it by pieces with total openness.
>
> Edgar
>
> *From: *"Sun, Yih Leong" <yih.leong.sun at intel.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 9:31 AM
> *To: *"Kunzmann, Gerald" <kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com>, Zhipeng Huang 
> <zhipengh512 at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"user-committee at lists.openstack.org" 
> <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo
>
> +1
>
> Prefix WIP on the commit message. And set workflow as “-1”.
>
> For example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409878/ 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__review.openstack.org_-23_c_409878_&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=-UTHb9EYMmqVNj6Q5mOAMJlz3b9HlBKRaOP8STQSG-A&e=>
>
> *From:*Kunzmann, Gerald [mailto:kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 1, 2017 8:24 AM
> *To:* Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh512 at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Sun, Yih Leong <yih.leong.sun at intel.com>; Tobias Rydberg 
> <tobias at citynetwork.se>; user-committee at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* RE: [User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo
>
> Hi Tobias,
>
> One option could be marking the user story as [WIP] (or any other tag 
> we agree) as long as you are internally working on it? As soon as you 
> remove the tag, this would indicate to wider user committee community 
> to start the broader review.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gerald
>
> *From:*Zhipeng Huang [mailto:zhipengh512 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 1. März 2017 14:16
> *To:*Kunzmann, Gerald <kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com 
> <mailto:kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com>>
> *Cc:* Sun, Yih Leong <yih.leong.sun at intel.com 
> <mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com>>; Tobias Rydberg 
> <tobias at citynetwork.se <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>>; 
> user-committee at lists.openstack.org 
> <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo
>
> HI Gerald and all,
>
> The reason why we in public cloud wg are thinking about setting up our 
> own repo is that for public cloud specific use cases, we could first 
> review it within our group from pure public cloud perspective. and 
> then if the use cases are potentially widely adaptive, then we will 
> output the use cases to openstack-user-story for a broader review.
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Kunzmann, Gerald 
> <kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com <mailto:kunzmann at docomolab-euro.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Tobias,
>
>     I also would be interested to see how/why the template does not
>     fit and check whether we could align, e.g. by adding some optional
>     section into user story template.
>
>     Unfortunately, Wednesday 14:00 UTC is also not possible for me.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Gerald
>
>     *From:*Sun, Yih Leong [mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com
>     <mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com>]
>     *Sent:* Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 23:26
>     *To:* Tobias Rydberg <tobias at citynetwork.se
>     <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>>;
>     user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] [Product] Gerrit repo
>
>     If it is just a template issue and I think that can be easily work
>     with.
>
>     It will be great if you could let me know why the template does
>     not fit your use case?
>
>     We at Product WG are always looks for improvement. J
>
>     Unfortunately 1400 UTC is not a good time for me.
>
>     *From:*Tobias Rydberg [mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se]
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, February 28, 2017 2:15 PM
>     *To:* user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: [User-committee] [User-Committee] Gerrit repo
>
>     Thanks for your replies!
>
>     We did discuss that, the reason that we wanted to go with our own
>     was basically that the template does not look exactly the same as
>     is, and in that case more clear to have them separated. Also to be
>     able to have other documents there that are produced by the
>     publiccloud-wg.
>
>     I can agree about the use cases/stories, would be awesome to have
>     them in the same place. Does it matter if our use cases/user
>     stories are not following the same template? We are currently in
>     the process of specifying the template. Will bring this question
>     to the team at tomorrows meeting. You are all welcome at 1400 UTC
>     #openstack-meeting-3 to join the discussion. =)
>
>     Regards,
>     Tobias
>
>     On 2017-02-28 22:15, Yih Leong, Sun. wrote:
>
>         I would agree with Ken and recommend to submit that as a user
>         story to Product WG repo.
>
>
>         On Tuesday, February 28, 2017, Melvin Hillsman
>         <mrhillsman at gmail.com <mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             +1
>
>             --
>
>             *Melvin Hillsman*
>
>             Ops Technical Lead
>             OpenStack Innovation Center
>
>
>             mrhillsman at gmail.com <mailto:mrhillsman at gmail.com>
>             phone: (210) 312-1267 <tel:%28210%29%20312-1267>
>             mobile: (210) 413-1659 <tel:%28210%29%20413-1659>
>             Learner | Ideation | Belief | Responsibility | Command
>
>             http://osic.org
>             <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__osic.org_&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=jnKwqze25lOUJ8iEpzU0mwbqD-expVCTVQba6uFkFWI&e=>
>
>
>             On Feb 28, 2017, at 14:11, Edgar Magana
>             <edgar.magana at workday.com
>             <mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:
>
>                 Excellent point Kenny!
>
>                 Tobias,
>
>                 Any concerns using the current repo?
>
>                 Edgar
>
>                 *From: *Kenny Johnston <kenny at kencjohnston.com
>                 <mailto:kenny at kencjohnston.com>>
>                 *Date: *Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 11:55 AM
>                 *To: *Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com
>                 <mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>>
>                 *Cc: *Tobias Rydberg <tobias at citynetwork.se
>                 <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>>,
>                 "user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>                 <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>"
>                 <user-committee at lists.openstack.org
>                 <mailto:user-committee at lists.openstack.org>>, Thierry
>                 Carrez <thierry at openstack.org
>                 <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>>
>                 *Subject: *Re: [User-committee] [User-Committee]
>                 Gerrit repo
>
>                 On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Edgar Magana
>                 <edgar.magana at workday.com
>                 <mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:
>
>                     Hello,
>
>                     Go a head and make the request to infra to have a
>                     new repo. For instance:
>                     https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427819/
>                     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__review.openstack.org_-23_c_427819_&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=ecd2laeilied37Ii26V2vNyX35FmgVrRfQvoPYrxL4Y&s=OsJTI_Kpjs4NQ29MKDA7YxlgI9InH8Nroge6CchIiF8&e=>
>
>                     Add UC members for approval.
>
>                     Thanks,
>
>                     Edgar
>
>
>                     On 2/28/17, 1:07 AM, "Tobias Rydberg"
>                     <tobias at citynetwork.se
>                     <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>> wrote:
>
>                         Hi all,
>
>                         We in the publiccloud-wg are looking into the
>                     possibility to get our own
>                         Gerrit repo? The reason for this repo would
>                     first of all be to host our
>                         use cases that we will create and
>                     documentation around that, and to have
>                         a formal creation process for these use cases.
>                     We have looked at how
>                         Product WG have been working with their Users
>                     Stories and believe it
>                         would be wise to try to have something similar.
>
>                 I'd recommend against doing this. The "User Stories"
>                 repository[2] is not exclusive to PWG members, but
>                 should be considered a place to define and merge user
>                 stories for all UC groups/teams.
>
>                 [2]
>                 https://github.com/openstack/openstack-user-stories
>                 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openstack_openstack-2Duser-2Dstories&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=ecd2laeilied37Ii26V2vNyX35FmgVrRfQvoPYrxL4Y&s=CxPGKXc-Ruo-UAMh9IXcibh4rpDhCkXxkEh1nhRJ0N0&e=>
>
>
>                         We are here to motivate this further and
>                     listen to feedback!
>
>                         Kind regards,
>
>                         Tobias Rydberg
>                         Co-Chair Public Cloud WG
>                     tobias at citynetwork.se <mailto:tobias at citynetwork.se>
>
>                     _______________________________________________
>                     User-committee mailing list
>                     User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>                     <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>                     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>                     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=ecd2laeilied37Ii26V2vNyX35FmgVrRfQvoPYrxL4Y&s=V5Eg4m1oBZG9ezH27Ow2tyS9tWfvEhq6olFHSzE7pO0&e=>
>
>
>
>                 -- 
>
>                 Kenny Johnston | irc:kencjohnston | @kencjohnston
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 User-committee mailing list
>                 User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>                 <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>                 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>                 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=VH-pyMncEN3DTtAKGTHFcfUWMAP5f6T-wTtn--NJQ6A&e=>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         User-committee mailing list
>
>         User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>         <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=VH-pyMncEN3DTtAKGTHFcfUWMAP5f6T-wTtn--NJQ6A&e=>
>
>     -- 
>
>
>
>
>     	
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     User-committee mailing list
>     User-committee at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DwMGaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=zcscB71bvTU_WjE2uI75DlJZBIE7h4Z2LCKboe5G0j0&s=VH-pyMncEN3DTtAKGTHFcfUWMAP5f6T-wTtn--NJQ6A&e=>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
>
> Standard Engineer
>
> IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
>
> Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
>
> Email: huangzhipeng at huawei.com <mailto:huangzhipeng at huawei.com>
>
> Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen
>
> (Previous)
>
> Research Assistant
>
> Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
>
> University of California, Irvine
>
> Email: zhipengh at uci.edu <mailto:zhipengh at uci.edu>
>
> Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402
>
> OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-committee mailing list
> User-committee at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee

-- 



	*Tobias Rydberg*
Senior Developer

Mobile: +46 733 312780
Support: +46 8 4000 9000

tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se <mailto:tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.se>
www.citynetwork.se <http://www.citynetwork.se>

City Network Hosting AB
Borgmästaregatan 18
SE-371 34 Karlskrona
Sweden


Innovation through open IT Infrastructure

ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 Certified

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170301/f89dbcc8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CityNetwork-Logo-Regular-2015-RGB.png
Type: image/png
Size: 42960 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170301/f89dbcc8/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3945 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170301/f89dbcc8/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the User-committee mailing list