[User-committee] [Product] PWG Midcycle Teleconference

Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com
Tue Jun 27 14:37:03 UTC 2017


I am for teleconference.
My preference is to do it for 2 hours in late afternoon.
Suggest doodle to determine best time slots

From: Sun, Yih Leong [mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 5:01 PM
To: user-committee at lists.openstack.org
Subject: [User-committee] [Product] PWG Midcycle Teleconference

Hi Product WG,

As discussed in PWG irc meeting, we will not be hosting any face-to-face midcycle meeting for Product WG this time, neither at Ops Midcycle (Aug 2017) nor PTG (Sep 2017). Instead, we are considering a Teleconferencing method.

There can be various options in terms of format and number of occurrences.
For example, in today IRC, Rocky suggested that we probably can run the teleconf 2 hours at US Pacific (beginning of day) and 2 hours at the end,  then run for couple of days. We can arrange a specific agenda item to be discussed at specific hour and day, etc.

If this is feasible, we need to determine dates, time and agenda.

Prior to finalizing any decision, I would like to solicit feedback if a teleconferencing method would work for most?
All feedback and suggestion are welcome.

Thanks!

---
Yih Leong Sun, PhD (宋毅良)
Senior Software Cloud Architect | Open Source Technology Center | Intel Corporation
yih.leong.sun at intel.com<mailto:yih.leong.sun at intel.com> | +1 503 264 0610

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/user-committee/attachments/20170627/dde876e9/attachment.html>


More information about the User-committee mailing list